org-mode/contrib/babel/library-of-babel.org

127 lines
3.2 KiB
Org Mode
Raw Normal View History

2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
#+title: The Library of Babel
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO PROPOSED | DONE DEFERRED REJECTED
2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
#+OPTIONS: H:3 num:nil toc:2 \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:t -:t f:t *:t TeX:t LaTeX:t skip:nil d:(HIDE) tags:not-in-toc
#+STARTUP: odd hideblocks
#+STYLE: <style type="text/css">#outline-container-1 { clear:both; }</style>
#+begin_html
<div id="logo" style="float: left; text-align: center; max-width: 340px; font-size: 8pt; margin-left: 1em;">
<p>
<img src="../../images/babel/library-of-babel.png" alt="Library of Babel"/>
<div id="attr">
The Library of Babel, by Pierre Clayette
<p>
<a href="http://downlode.org/Etext/library_of_babel.html">Full text of the Borges short story</a>
</p>
</div>
</p>
</div>
#+end_html
2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
* Introduction
The Library of Babel is an extensible collection of ready-made and
easily-shortcut-callable source-code blocks for handling common
tasks. Org-babel comes pre-populated with the source-code blocks
located in this file. It is possible to add source-code blocks from
any org-mode file to the library by calling =(org-babel-lob-ingest
"path/to/file.org")=.
This file is included in worg mainly less for viewing through the
web interface, and more for contribution through the worg git
repository. If you have code snippets that you think others may
find useful please add them to this file and [[file:~/src/worg/worg-git.org::contribute-to-worg][contribute them]] to
worg.
The raw Org-mode text of this file can be downloaded at
[[repofile:contrib/babel/library-of-babel.org][library-of-babel.org]]
2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
* Simple
A collection of simple utility functions
#+srcname: echo
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var input="echo'd"
input
#+end_src
* File I/O
** reading and writing files
Read the contents of the file at =path= into a string.
#+srcname: read
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var path=""
(with-temp-filebuffer path
(buffer-substring (point-min) (point-max)))
#+end_src
Read the lines of the file at =path= into a list.
#+srcname: read-lines
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var path=""
(split-string
(with-temp-filebuffer path
(buffer-substring (point-min) (point-max))))
#+end_src
Write =data= to a file at =path=. If =data= is a list, then write it
as a table in traditional Org-mode table syntax.
#+srcname: write
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var data="" :var path=""
(with-temp-file path
(org-babel-insert-result data))
nil
#+end_src
* Plotting code
2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
** R
Plot column 2 (y axis) against column 1 (x axis). Columns 3 and beyond, if present, are ignored.
Enabling LoB to put results in buffer, and slowly moving towards more unified concept of function calls. Previously LoB calls were not able to produce results in the buffer. These changes go some way to allowing them to do that. [There are still some bugs to deal with]. That meant changing org-babel.el so that there is a notion of the `source block name' for a LoB line, in order to construct a #+resname (currently I've made the name the same as the function call). I'm also slowly moving towards unifying the notion of `function calls' a bit more: I've changed the org-babel-lob-one-liner-regexp so that instead of a monolithic match it now matches first the function name, and second the function arguments in parentheses. org-babel-lob-get-info makes that match, and although it still concatenates them and returns the string, the two elements can be accessed immediately afterwards using match-string. So that situation is very similar to org-babel-get-src-block-name, whose job (in this branch) is also to parse the function *name* and the function *arguments*. In a few places in the code (esp. function names), I think the word `info' should be replaced with `call' or `function call', which I believe more accurately indicates what the `info' is: a function definition, together with bound arguments/references. The function call syntax, i.e. function-name(arg1=ref1), originally introduced for references (and thereby in LoB), and which I'm proposing we use throughout, raises the question of default arguments, and those being over-ridden by supplied arguments, as in e.g. python, and R.
2009-07-10 22:59:10 -04:00
#+srcname: R-plot(data=R-plot-example-data)
#+begin_src R :session *R*
plot(data)
#+end_src
Enabling LoB to put results in buffer, and slowly moving towards more unified concept of function calls. Previously LoB calls were not able to produce results in the buffer. These changes go some way to allowing them to do that. [There are still some bugs to deal with]. That meant changing org-babel.el so that there is a notion of the `source block name' for a LoB line, in order to construct a #+resname (currently I've made the name the same as the function call). I'm also slowly moving towards unifying the notion of `function calls' a bit more: I've changed the org-babel-lob-one-liner-regexp so that instead of a monolithic match it now matches first the function name, and second the function arguments in parentheses. org-babel-lob-get-info makes that match, and although it still concatenates them and returns the string, the two elements can be accessed immediately afterwards using match-string. So that situation is very similar to org-babel-get-src-block-name, whose job (in this branch) is also to parse the function *name* and the function *arguments*. In a few places in the code (esp. function names), I think the word `info' should be replaced with `call' or `function call', which I believe more accurately indicates what the `info' is: a function definition, together with bound arguments/references. The function call syntax, i.e. function-name(arg1=ref1), originally introduced for references (and thereby in LoB), and which I'm proposing we use throughout, raises the question of default arguments, and those being over-ridden by supplied arguments, as in e.g. python, and R.
2009-07-10 22:59:10 -04:00
#+tblname: R-plot-example-data
| 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 |
| 3 | 9 |
| 4 | 16 |
| 5 | 25 |
Enabling LoB to put results in buffer, and slowly moving towards more unified concept of function calls. Previously LoB calls were not able to produce results in the buffer. These changes go some way to allowing them to do that. [There are still some bugs to deal with]. That meant changing org-babel.el so that there is a notion of the `source block name' for a LoB line, in order to construct a #+resname (currently I've made the name the same as the function call). I'm also slowly moving towards unifying the notion of `function calls' a bit more: I've changed the org-babel-lob-one-liner-regexp so that instead of a monolithic match it now matches first the function name, and second the function arguments in parentheses. org-babel-lob-get-info makes that match, and although it still concatenates them and returns the string, the two elements can be accessed immediately afterwards using match-string. So that situation is very similar to org-babel-get-src-block-name, whose job (in this branch) is also to parse the function *name* and the function *arguments*. In a few places in the code (esp. function names), I think the word `info' should be replaced with `call' or `function call', which I believe more accurately indicates what the `info' is: a function definition, together with bound arguments/references. The function call syntax, i.e. function-name(arg1=ref1), originally introduced for references (and thereby in LoB), and which I'm proposing we use throughout, raises the question of default arguments, and those being over-ridden by supplied arguments, as in e.g. python, and R.
2009-07-10 22:59:10 -04:00
#+lob: R-plot(data=R-plot-example-data)
#+resname: R-plot(data=R-plot-example-data)
: nil
Enabling LoB to put results in buffer, and slowly moving towards more unified concept of function calls. Previously LoB calls were not able to produce results in the buffer. These changes go some way to allowing them to do that. [There are still some bugs to deal with]. That meant changing org-babel.el so that there is a notion of the `source block name' for a LoB line, in order to construct a #+resname (currently I've made the name the same as the function call). I'm also slowly moving towards unifying the notion of `function calls' a bit more: I've changed the org-babel-lob-one-liner-regexp so that instead of a monolithic match it now matches first the function name, and second the function arguments in parentheses. org-babel-lob-get-info makes that match, and although it still concatenates them and returns the string, the two elements can be accessed immediately afterwards using match-string. So that situation is very similar to org-babel-get-src-block-name, whose job (in this branch) is also to parse the function *name* and the function *arguments*. In a few places in the code (esp. function names), I think the word `info' should be replaced with `call' or `function call', which I believe more accurately indicates what the `info' is: a function definition, together with bound arguments/references. The function call syntax, i.e. function-name(arg1=ref1), originally introduced for references (and thereby in LoB), and which I'm proposing we use throughout, raises the question of default arguments, and those being over-ridden by supplied arguments, as in e.g. python, and R.
2009-07-10 22:59:10 -04:00
2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
** Gnuplot
* Table/Matrix manipulation
Elegant lisp code for transposing a matrix.
#+tblname: transpose-example
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 5 | 6 |
#+srcname: transpose
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=transpose-example
(apply #'mapcar* #'list table)
#+end_src
#+resname:
| 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 5 |
| 3 | 6 |
2009-08-05 10:02:25 -04:00
* Misc
#+srcname: python-identity(a=1)
Enabling LoB to put results in buffer, and slowly moving towards more unified concept of function calls. Previously LoB calls were not able to produce results in the buffer. These changes go some way to allowing them to do that. [There are still some bugs to deal with]. That meant changing org-babel.el so that there is a notion of the `source block name' for a LoB line, in order to construct a #+resname (currently I've made the name the same as the function call). I'm also slowly moving towards unifying the notion of `function calls' a bit more: I've changed the org-babel-lob-one-liner-regexp so that instead of a monolithic match it now matches first the function name, and second the function arguments in parentheses. org-babel-lob-get-info makes that match, and although it still concatenates them and returns the string, the two elements can be accessed immediately afterwards using match-string. So that situation is very similar to org-babel-get-src-block-name, whose job (in this branch) is also to parse the function *name* and the function *arguments*. In a few places in the code (esp. function names), I think the word `info' should be replaced with `call' or `function call', which I believe more accurately indicates what the `info' is: a function definition, together with bound arguments/references. The function call syntax, i.e. function-name(arg1=ref1), originally introduced for references (and thereby in LoB), and which I'm proposing we use throughout, raises the question of default arguments, and those being over-ridden by supplied arguments, as in e.g. python, and R.
2009-07-10 22:59:10 -04:00
#+begin_src python
a
#+end_src
#+srcname: python-add(a=1, b=2)
#+begin_src python
a + b
#+end_src