ndwarshuis
/
org-mode
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Minor updates and responses in the sessions planning subtree.

This commit is contained in:
Dan Davison 2009-06-02 16:45:31 -04:00
parent 37758310e0
commit 0df550d84c
1 changed files with 21 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
org-babel.org
View File

@ -235,13 +235,10 @@ Once this is done every variable should be able to dump regions into
their inferior-process buffer using major-mode functions.
*** TODO some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten [2/3]
While I remember, some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten
come to mind in that regard:
While I remember, some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten
come to mind in that regard:
**** DEFERRED a hook called when the src edit buffer is created
This should be implemented in the org-mode core
**** DEFERRED Remap C-x C-s to save the source to the org buffer?
**** DONE Remap C-x C-s to save the source to the org buffer?
I've done this personally and I find it essential. I'm using
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defun org-edit-src-save ()
@ -272,7 +269,21 @@ org-mode core
Maybe we should name the buffer with a combination of the source
code and the session. I think that makes sense.
Are you also suggesting a new org-edit-src minor mode?
[ES] Are you also suggesting a new org-edit-src minor mode?
[DED] org-exit-edit-mode is a minor mode that already exists:
Minor mode installing a single key binding, "C-c '" to exit special edit.
org-edit-src-save now has a binding in that mode, so I guess all
I'm saying at this stage is that it's a bit of a misnomer. But
perhaps we will also have more functionality to add to that minor
mode, making it even more of a misnomer. Perhaps something like
org-src-mode would be better.
**** DEFERRED a hook called when the src edit buffer is created
This should be implemented in the org-mode core
*** DEFERRED send code to inferior process
Another thought on this topic: I think we will want users to send
@ -306,6 +317,9 @@ being edited. I think that we should either do this before the buffer
is opened or not at all, specifically I think we should resolve
references if the user calls C-c ' with a prefix argument. Does that
sound reasonable? [Eric]
Yes [Dan]
** TODO fully purge org-babel-R of direct comint interaction
try to remove all code under the [[file:lisp/org-babel-R.el::functions%20for%20evaluation%20of%20R%20code][;; functions for evaluation of R code]] line