Fix bug with protecting LaTeX macros
The regular expression was not optimal, and if there was a horizontal rule, search would not start from the beginning of the buffer but from after the rule!
This commit is contained in:
parent
f444c8cd67
commit
41d82c78f9
|
@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
|
|||
2009-12-16 Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* org-latex.el (org-export-latex-preprocess): Better version of
|
||||
the regular expression for protecting LaTeX macros.
|
||||
(org-export-latex-preprocess): Start searching for macros to
|
||||
protect from beginning of buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
* org-exp.el (org-export-target-internal-links): Check for
|
||||
protectedness earlier in the string.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1877,11 +1877,11 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
|
|||
(replace-match (org-export-latex-protect-string "\\hrule") t t)))
|
||||
|
||||
;; Protect LaTeX commands like \command[...]{...} or \command{...}
|
||||
(let ((re (concat "\\\\[a-zA-Z]+\\(?:"
|
||||
"\\[.*\\]"
|
||||
"\\)?"
|
||||
"\\(" (org-create-multibrace-regexp "{" "}" 3)
|
||||
"\\)\\{1,3\\}")))
|
||||
(goto-char (point-min))
|
||||
(let ((re (concat
|
||||
"\\\\[a-zA-Z]+"
|
||||
"\\(?:\\[[^][\n]*?\\]\\)*"
|
||||
"\\(" (org-create-multibrace-regexp "{" "}" 3) "\\)\\{1,3\\}")))
|
||||
(while (re-search-forward re nil t)
|
||||
(unless (save-excursion (goto-char (match-beginning 0))
|
||||
(equal (char-after (point-at-bol)) ?#))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue