Chris Randle writes:
> I have one giant Org-mode file for everything. I frequently use
> `C-c C-x b' to take the current node and show it in a new frame
> with narrow subtree so that I can concentrate on just that region
> of my file. Rather like hoist in GrandView, if anyone remembers
> that.
>
> My Org Manual (6.24b) says "The indirect buffer...will contain
> the entire buffer, but will be narrowed to the current
> tree. Editing the indirect buffer will also change the original
> buffer, but without affecting visibility in that buffer.
>
> I've noticed that, when working in the new frame, changing the
> TODO state of any item within the frame to DONE (when it is the
> currently clocked in item) does not stop the clock. Going back to
> my main frame and doing the same thing there on the same item
> does stop the clock.
>
> I haven't altered `org-clock-out-when-done', and Emacs reports
> its value as t.
This was caused by the fact that markers seem to point to the
base buffer always, so we need to check if the current buffer's
base buffer is equal to the marker buffer.
David Maus writes:
> When I start to clock a headline (C-c C-x C-i) that does not have a
> LOGBOOK drawer orgmode inserts one but removes the indentation of the
> first line below the headline:
>
> Example:
>
> * TODO Do something
> Do this, do that etc.
>
> after C-c C-x C-i becomes
>
> * TODO Do something
> :LOGBOOK:
> CLOCK: [2009-03-20 Fr 19:03]--[2009-03-20 Fr 19:03] => 0:00
> :END:
> Do this, do that etc.
Fixed with this commit, a patch written by Peter Jones.
Adam Elliott writes:
> When run in day-step mode, the clocktable header line for each day's
> table contains an active timestamp. I figure it should be an inactive
> timestamp, since otherwise I get a junk entry in the agenda each day
> (whatever heading was previous to the clocktable).
>
> I'm talking about the output from a spec such as the following:
>
> #+BEGIN: clocktable :block thisweek :step day
This commit is the patch Adam sent in.
Clock lines are now by default captured into the drawer LOGBOOK. This
means that, if state notes are also captured into a drawer, they will
be mixed with notes.
Wanrong Lin writes:
My TODO sequence is set up as following:
(setq org-todo-keywords '((sequence "TODO(t)" "STARTED(s!)"
"WAITING(w@/!)" "MAYBE(m/!)" "DELEGATED(g@/!)"
"DEFERRED(d!/!)" "HOLD(h!/!)" "|" "DONE(x)" "CANCELED(c)")))
The state change logging is great, but I wonder whether we can
further improve it:
1. Can we also include the original state in the log message?
i.e.: instead of having - State "DEFERRED" [2009-02-11 Wed 11:38]
we can have
- State "DEFERRED" from "HOLD" [2009-02-11 Wed 11:38]
The message will be clearer, and useful even when somebody edited
the TODO keyword in place without using the "org-todo" command
(in that case, simply looking at all the "destination states" in
the log message does not give us the right information).
This strikes me like a good idea, so I have implemented it with this
commit.
Consider a file with 2 lines:
------------------
**** heading
------------------
Place the cursor at line 2 (where you can type). Then use C-c C-x C-i
to start a clock.
You have now 3 lines:
------------------
**** heading
CLOCK: [2009-02-07 sb 01:06]
------------------
However, the cursor is still placed at line 2, like before. I think
it would be more useful if it were moved to line 3 so that you can
start writing right away, just as before. This saves you the C-n
needed to move again to a blank line.
This commit implements exactly this request.
Daniel Clemente noticed that the clock drawer, when it is created for
the second clock entry, will swallow a plain list item after it,
because it thinks it might be a clock note.
This commit makes this function check for indentation. If the plain
list item is indented less than the last clock line, it will be
assumed that it does not belong to the clocking line, and the drawer
will not swallow the item.
David Bremner writes:
I have a clocktable that begins like this.
#+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :block 2009-W05 :scope agenda-with-archives
Clock summary at [2009-01-27 Tue 17:15], for week 2009-W04.
[contents snipped]
#+END:
Whatever week I put in :block, it puts one less in the title. It
seems actually gather the clock data from the right week, but the
title is wrong? Or I misunderstand something as usual :-).
There was a problem wit the week starting date.
William Henney writes:
If a heading has tags, then that heading's time summary
overlay (shown by C-c C-x C-d) is displayed using the
org-tag face. This looks a bit strange. Is it intended? It
is especially noticeable in my case, since I have my tags
shown in a smaller font.
This is cause by the fact that we use the `secondary-selection' face
here which only highlights but inherits the rest from what is below.
The idea was that these clock times should have the same color as the
headline they belong to, but this idea is defeated when a line has tags
with a very different face.
This commit introduces a separate face for this purpose, so that users
can customize it.
Carsten Dominik