This support was totally broken. It works now again. Unfortunately
it is not possible to edit the table directly in the org-mode buffer
anymore - to edit such a table, you have to use C-c '
This patch implements reading American dates, like
2/5/3 --> 2003-02-05
2/5 --> ????-02-05
Is also fixes a bug that would force the current year when reading a
date like 2/5 (American) or 2-5 (ISO), and in this way would prevent
`org-read-date-prefer-future' to do its job. This bug was reported by
Lukasz Stelmach.
Also get rid of a bug: as timers where not properly canceled,
`org-timer-show-remaining-time' was not giving the proper result.
Thanks to Frédéric Couchet for this catch.
The `org-clock-set-current' and `org-clock-delete-current' functions
handle this variable. The variable only stores the last clocked in
entry, not the history of clocked in tasks.
This can help to get out of an inconsistent state produce for example
by viewing from the agenda. Reported by Matt Lundin:
> I'd like to report a minor issue with org-agenda-goto and inline tasks.
> Let's say one has the following file:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * Here is an entry.
> Blah blah blah blah.
> *************** Here is an inline task.
> *************** END
> Blah blah blah blah blah.
> *************** TODO Here is a second inline task.
> *************** END
> Blah blah blah blah blah.
> *************** Here is a third inline task
> *************** END
> Blah blah blah blah blah.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Let's say one also has the following settings:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (setq org-show-hierarchy-above t)
> (setq org-show-siblings '((default . nil) (isearch . t) (agenda . t)))
> (setq org-show-entry-below '((default . nil) (isearch . t) (agenda . t)))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> If 1) one tries to jump to the TODO from the agenda and 2) the entry is
> currently folded, org-show-context reveals only the headlines. E.g.,
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * Here is an entry.
> *************** Here is an inline task.
> *************** END...
> *************** TODO Here is a second inline task.
> *************** END...
> *************** Here is a third inline task
> *************** END...
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Invoking org-cycle on the END headline does nothing, since all headlines
> deeper than org-inlinetask-min-level are exempted from cycling. As a
> result, the only way to reveal the text in the entry is to cycle the
> parent twice (first to close, then to reveal).
Ruud Brekelmans writes about problems with spurious footnotes:
> I still find similar behavior when exporting to LaTeX with:
>
> #+BEGIN_LaTeX
> \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\lVert#1\rVert}
> #+END_LaTeX
Emilio Arias writes:
> egallego@babel.ls.fi.upm.es (Emilio Jess Gallego Arias) writes:
>
> To reproduce save this minimal org file:
>
> #+STARTUP: even
> * A
> :PROPERTIES:
> :ARCHIVE: a
> :END:
> ** B :ARCHIVE:
> Some text
>
> and hit TAB when in the * A headline; then the ** B headline contents
> will be incorrectly shown.
>
> I've found the culprit in org-hide-archived-subtrees:
>
> ,----
> | (defun org-hide-archived-subtrees (beg end)
> | "Re-hide all archived subtrees after a visibility state change."
> | (save-excursion
> | (let* ((re (concat ":" org-archive-tag ":")))
> | (goto-char beg)
> | (while (re-search-forward re end t)
> | (and (org-on-heading-p) (org-flag-subtree t))
> | (org-end-of-subtree t)))))
> `----
>
> The problem is that the RE matches the first archive "property" and
> then does an org-end-of-subtree which skips all the subtrees of the
> parent tree where the ARCHIVE property is located.
>
> I've replaced this part
>
> | (and (org-on-heading-p) (org-flag-subtree t))
> | (org-end-of-subtree t)))))
>
> by
>
> | (when (org-on-heading-p)
> | (org-flag-subtree t)
> | (org-end-of-subtree t)))))))
>
> so org-end-of-subtree is only called if we are really in a headline. I
> think that makes sense.
>
Wes Hardaker writes:
> Attached is a patch that lets local variables define whether or not todo
> dependency blocking should be used (both for TODOs and for checkboxes).
> I have one file in particular that I'm using checkboxes to quickly
> indicate multi-selections from a list but for most of my files I want
> TODOs blocked by uncompleted checkboxes.
>
> Normally org uses hook methods for checking for TODO blocks and this
> patch just inserts a check at the top to test and see if the variable
> turning on the blocking type is still set.
Carsten Dominik
Bastien Guerry
Andy Lutomirski
Dan Davison