(org-clock-resolve-clock): New function that resolves a clock to a
specific time, closing or resuming as need be, and possibly even
starting a new clock.
(org-clock-resolve): New function used by `org-resolve-clocks' that sets
up for the call to `org-clock-resolve-clock'. It determines the time to
resolve to based on a single-character selection from the user to either
keep time, subtract away time or cancel the clock.
(org-resolve-clocks): New user command which resolves dangling clocks --
that is, open but not active -- anywhere in the file list returned by
`org-files-list'.
(org-clock-in): Automatically resolve dangling clocks whenever a user
clocks in.
(org-clock-cancel): If the user cancels the solely clock in a LOGBOOK,
remove the empty drawer.
(org-files-list): New utility function for returning a list of all open
org-mode buffers, plus all files used to build the agenda buffer. Note
that not all the files will necessarily be visited by a buffer at time
of call.
(org-entry-beginning-position): Like the function
`line-beginning-position', this inline function returns the beginning
position of the current heading/entry.
(org-entry-end-position): Like the function `line-end-position', this
inline function returns the end position of the current heading/entry.
PT writes:
> Currently, I'm using Google Calendar and it's quick add syntax is very
> convenient:
>
> http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=36604#text
>
>
> Of course, Org has similar capabilites, but I found one thing which
> google calendar does better: if it's 4pm and I add an event for 8am
> then GCal schedules it for 8am tomorrow.
>
> Org, on the the other hand, schedules it for 8am today even if that
> time is already passed.
>
> I never add past events and I think it's quite atypical. Shouldn't be
> an option similar to org-read-date-prefer-future for times too, so
> that timestamps also prefer the future when no date given?
This is now possible, but it is not the default. You need to set
(setq org-read-date-prefer-future 'time)
priority
So far the headline had to match the one specified in the template
exactly, except for tags. Now a TODO keyword and a priority can be
added, and the headline will still be found.
Reported by Samuel Wales and Bernt Hansen.
Peter Westlake writes:
> Could I request this as a small feature enhancement, please?
> Commands like org-refile have an agenda equivalent so that
> the same keys work in the agenda, and it would be very nice
> to be able to store a link to an item that way as well.
Carsten Dominik
John Wiegley