Agenda bulk commands on marked entries now can also set the scheduling
date or a deadline. Normally, all entries will be set to the
specified date. However, when writing the change as "++5d" or "++2w",
then each time stamp will independently be shifted by that amount.
This commit implements refiling directly from the agenda.
It also implements a mechanism for selecting a number of entries in
the agenda and then executing a command on all of them. Possible
actions include archive, refile, todo state setting, and more.
When the agenda buffer for an agenda series is created, this was so
far done without the options of the custom agenda command in place.
This meant that some options would not take effect, because the only
place where that did would have an effect was during creation of that
buffer.
This commit makes sure that the global options of an agenda series are
in fact in place when the buffer is created.
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> As I was saying in anoter post, it looks like there's something
> weird happening when using C-k in agenda view:
>
> 1. Create two new remember entries (i.e. test and test2) with the
> same tag (I used @office)
> 2. Narrow down the agenda view to only see the @office entries.
> 3. Kill the last but one entry (it should be "test") : both of
> "test" and "test2" disappear frow the view. Actually, "test2" is
> not properly killed, but it is scary nonetheless.
>
> It only happens with two last entries.
>
> Is anyone able to reproduce this ?
Peter Frings writes:
> Good day, org-ers
>
> I have seen a *small* problem in the Agenda's log mode.
>
> Org-mode version 6.26d
> GNU Emacs 22.3.1 (i386-apple-darwin9.5.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0) of 2008-11-01
>
>
> I have this in time-sheets.org:
>
>
> * Project AI
> ** Enhancement PT <2009-04-30 Thu 10:00-11:00 +1w>
> CLOCK: [2009-05-14 Thu 09:55]--[2009-05-14 Thu 10:45] => 0:50
>
>
> But, the Agenda shows this:
>
> Day-agenda (W20):
> Thursday 14 May 2009
> 9:00...... ----------------
> planning: 9:12- 9:55 Clocked: (0:43) BUSY Notifications
> time-sheet: 10:00-11:00 Clocked: (0:50) Enhancement PT
> time-sheet: 10:00-11:00 Enhancement PT
> 10:00...... ----------------
> 11:00...... ----------------
>
He is right. Progress lines should never take their
time from the headline, always only from the triggering line.
Benjamin Andresen writes:
> I was curious as to why a value such log-mode wasn't customizable
> to be run on start-up as follow-mode and clock-report-mode are.
>
> If Carsten thinks this is a good idea, I've attached a patch that
> may shave of 5 seconds of him adding it. It applies cleanly to
> current git HEAD.
This commit applies Beanjamin's patch
Tassilo Horn writes:
> I have this entry in an org-file.
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ** bung Grundlagen der Softwaretechnik (B 016) :teaching:
> <2009-04-22 Wed 08:30-10:00 +1w>
> <2009-04-29 Wed 10:15-11:45> (Fr Hannes bernehmen)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I expect it to be displayed every wednesday after 2009-04-22
> for 08:30-10:00 and on 2009-04-29 it should be displayed
> twice: one at the usual time and one for 10:15-11:45.
>
> But the agenda shows only the regular entry (08:30-10:00)
> and omitts the exception. If I reorder the timestamps, so
> that the exception comes first, only the exception will be
> shown on 2009-04-29. Every other wednesday shows the
> regular repeater date.
>
> What do I have to do to make that entry showing up twice on
> 29th April?
This commit adds a new option
`org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry'. When set
to t, an entry that has multiple active time stamps will get
multiple lines in the agenda.
If the trigger for a log mode entry in the agenda has notes, for
example a note associated with a state change or with a clock entry,
the first line of the notes will now be added to the logbook entry.
You can turn this off the with new variable
`org-agenda-log-mode-add-notes'.
During secondary agenda filtering, pressing "?" now will install a
filter that selects entries which do not have an effort defined.
This new model was necessary because we needed to stop interpreting
entries with no effort defines as 0 effort. This was inconsistent,
because for normal agenda sorting, the treatment of these entries
depends on the variable `org-sort-agenda-noeffort-is-high'. Now this
variable is also respected during filtering.
Carsten Dominik