Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs writes:
A while ago I had this problem:
org-infojs-handle-options: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil
I wonder if my patch ever reached the mailing list, or if it
was overlooked because it was too close to christmas:
Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs schrieb:
From 0fef25f56c837ae9f434449c6f30268e0474f7ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs <delgado@dfn-cert.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:10:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix string-match against nil when no in-file options are set for jsinfo
---
lisp/org-jsinfo.el | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org-jsinfo.el b/lisp/org-jsinfo.el
index 8f2d7e8..19faa9e 100644
--- a/lisp/org-jsinfo.el
+++ b/lisp/org-jsinfo.el
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ Option settings will replace the %MANAGER-OPTIONS cookie."
default (cdr (assoc opt org-infojs-options)))
(and (symbolp default) (not (memq default '(t nil)))
(setq default (plist-get exp-plist default)))
- (if (string-match (format " %s:\\(\\S-+\\)" opt) v)
+ (if (and v
+ (string-match (format " %s:\\(\\S-+\\)" opt) v))
(setq val (match-string 1 v))
(setq val default))
(cond
It seems that CSS and Java-script stuff should be quoted in a very
strange way in order to make sure that the resulting file functions
correct in current browsers *and* validates against various XHTML and
XML standards. To be honest, the quoting technique seem really
strange, but Sebastian Rose argues, that this is the way to handle
this issue.
Carsten Dominik
Bernt Hansen