Karl Stump writes:
> Table Editing Cycle With Multiple Windows On One Buffer Does Not
> Return to Start State
>
> When I have two windows open on two buffers, one to a table in a
> file that I'm editing, the other to some other file of interest,
> the editing cycle of C-` ... C-c C-c works great, meaning that
> when the cycle is finished, the windows are restored to the start
> state.
>
> But when I have two windows open on the same buffer, one window
> on the table, and the other window somewhere else, the editing
> cycle does not restore to the beginning state.
Gregory Grubbs writes:
I like to make org-mode tables in arbitrary buffers, then
save them as CVS files. The export fails when done from a
buffer with no associated file.
Here's a little patch that allows exporting a table from
any buffer (org-mode version 6.28trans):
A relative row reference like @-1 in a table may now reach across a
horizontal separator line. I hope this will not break any important
tables out there, but I think it is the right thing to do.
The original reason for not-crossing was to implement running
averages of one column in the next. This can now be done using field
formulas near the beginning and end of the column, and a column
formula for the central part.
See the variable `org-table-relative-ref-may-cross-hline' for more
details.
Michael Brand writes:
> 2) One could like to have configurable left/right alignment, even
> combinable with column width, e. g.
>
> | <l10> | <r> |
> | 3.14 | 0x10 |
> | 3.141592=> | 0x32 0x10 |
Good idea, I would say.
When yasnippet is active, it is the official binding of TAB. That
means, the org-mode self-insert command must know that it may blank
table fields if the last command was yas/expand.
Rares Vernica writes:
> I think the standard references do not work correctly in the
> "remote" function. Moreover, the "edit all formulas" (C-c ')
> window replaces the internal references with standard
> references. Even if I toggle the references back to internal
> ones, the references in the "remote" function do not get
> updated.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> #+TBLNAME: TableA
> | 101 |
> #+TBLFM: @1$1=remote(TableC,@1$1)
>
> #+TBLNAME: TableB
> | A1 |
> #+TBLFM: @1$1=remote(TableC,A1)
>
> #+TBLNAME: TableC
> | 101 |
>
> If I do C-c * in TableA, it works correctly. In TableB it
> doesn't. If I do C-c ' in TableA and then (with or without
> C-c C-r) C-c C-c and C-c *, then the contents of TableA will
> be equivalent to the ones of TableB and the reference will
> be broken.
Standard references like A1 are now allowed in call to
remote().
Rares Vernica writes:
> I think I found another bug related to remote
> references. When I insert/remove a row/column using the
> table commands, the remote references to other tables are
> also updated. I think org treats "remote" as a regular
> function and updates the references inside it.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> #+TBLNAME: TableA
> | 101 |
> #+TBLFM: @1$1=remote(TableB,@1$1)
>
> #+TBLNAME: TableB
> | 101 |
>
> If I go in the cell of TableA and do M-S-down arrow, I get
> the following:
>
> #+TBLNAME: TableA
> | |
> | 101 |
> #+TBLFM: @2$1=remote(TableB,@2$1)
> ^^^^
>
> As you can see the remote reference has been updated. I
> similar update happens when I remove a row or insert/remove
> a column.
This commit makes sure that references inside calls to
remote() are not touched.
Carsten Dominik