- Attributes are now insetred generically based on an item (resource
or task) a list of attrbutes
- project end is now solely calculated and no longer inserted in the
node
* lisp/org.el (org-raise-scripts): Do not act in links.
Matt Lundin writes:
> Git commit 70d24c5d03 causes underscores
> in hyperlinks to display parts of link and description as subscripts.
> E.g., this link...
>
> [[http://www.samplepage.com/an_underscore][Some description words]]
>
> ...displays the word "Some" in the description as a subscript. With M-x
> visible-mode, the substring "underscore][Some" is displayed as a
> subscript.
* lisp/org-exp.el (org-export-remove-special-table-lines): Only fix table
lines that are not protected text.
Giovanni Moretti writes:
> I'm working up a presentation on orgmode for a local club and needed
> to prefix it with a brief emacs overview, and so included this:
>
> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
> ctrl-P (previous line)
> |
> |
> Ctrl-A <<< Ctrl-B <---- o ----> Ctrl-F >>> Ctrl-E
> Col 1 back char ! fwd char EOL
> !
> ctrl-N (next line)
> #+END_EXAMPLE
>
> : ctrl-P (previous line)
> : |
> : |
> : Ctrl-A <<< Ctrl-B <---- o ----> Ctrl-F >>> Ctrl-E
> : Col 1 back char | fwd char EOL
> : |
> : ctrl-N (next line)
>
> I'm using Orgmode v6.36c and when exporting to HTML (and LaTex
> Beamer), the two lines containing the single vertical bar immediately
> below the "ctrl-P" line in the #+EXAMPLE block vanish, whereas using
> the alternate colon at the beginning of the line notation, the
> rendering is as expected.
>
> Interestingly, enabling the +n option (#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE +n) causes the
> missing lines (lines 2 & 3) to reappear.
* lisp/org.el (org-edit-special): Make sure source code editing goes
before table formula editing.
* lisp/org-table.el (org-table-fedit-map): "C-c '" will now also exit
the formula editor.
Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl> writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> after a long time, I tried to edit a fixed width region today.
> So I entered
>
> : a
> : b
> : c
>
> and pressed "C-c '" in there. The edit buffer came up in
> read-only mode, which should not be so.
>
> Also, when I do "C-c '" in an empty line, it used to be the case
> that I get an empty artist buffer which I can then edit. Also this
> buffer comes up as read-only.
>
> I suspect that this has to do with the changes you made for read-only
> view buffers. Before I dive into this issue myself, maybe it will be
> much
> easier if you do this?
Hi Carsten,
You're right that it dates from then. Here's the fix I suggest. I've
tested that this results in writable fixed-width edit buffers, writable
src edit buffers, and non-writable babel preview buffers.
Dan
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
commit ed4eb9d150
Author: Dan Davison <davison@stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sat Jun 5 12:35:19 2010 +0100
* lisp/org-src.el: Prevent fixed-width region edit buffers
being created as read-only.
Modified lisp/org-src.el
* contrib/lisp/org-special-blocks.el (org-special-blocks-make-special-cookies):
Emacs 22 doesn't have string-match-p
* lisp/org-freemind.el (org-freemind-write-mm-buffer):
(org-freemind-get-node-style):
Emacs 22 doesn't have string-match-p
* lisp/org-html.el (org-html-make-link):
Use new org-string-match-p for compatibility
* lisp/org.el (org-read-date-analyze): Fix regular expression for
matching american dates
Daniel E. Doherty writes:
> In playing around with the date prompt (C-.), I ran across the following
> puzzling behavior from rather simple inputs.
>
> I entered the following on June 1, 2010. Here is a date entered as
> "3/15": <2011-03-15 Tue>. It interpreted it as the upcoming March 15 as
> expected.
>
> But here is a date entered as "5/21": <2021-06-05 Sat>. Note how it
> interpreted the "21" as the year 2021, not at all what I expected from
> the documentation or the analogous "3/15" example.
>
> Maybe there is some underlying logic here that I'm not getting. Perhaps
> it has to do with how 2-digit years are interpreted?
>
> What's going on here? I am using org-version 6.36trans on emacs 23.1.
What was going on here is that the regular expression for matching
american-style dates was wrong. It was looking for month numbers in
the second field and day numbers in the first field - wrong, of
course.
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-rm-props): Add org-emphasis to the properties
that must be removed.
* lisp/org.el (org-do-emphasis-faces): Add org-emphasis property to
items that have emphasis done wit font-lock.
(org-fontify-entities): Do not do anything in commented lines.
(org-unfontify-region): Decompose the region as well, because we do
composition during font-lock.
(org-raise-scripts): Do nothing inside an emphasis string.
Reported by Eric Fraga in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/25940
* lisp/org-compat.el (org-string-match-p):
(org-looking-at-p): New functions.
* lisp/org-table.el (org-table-align): Handle raised text with
invisible characters.
* lisp/org.el (org-script-display): Add raise properties for tables.
(org-raise-scripts): Handle raising differently inside tables.
Pretty display of subscripts and superscripts no longer messes up
table alignment. This is achieved by two things:
1. Inside tables, the raised characters are not made smaller, they
remains at the same size. Instead they are raise/lowered more, by
a full half character height to still be clearly readable as
subscript or superscript.
2. The invisible characters are taken into account when computing the
field width.
* lisp/org.el (org-ctrl-k-protect-subtree): New option.
(org-kill-line): Protect hidden subtrees if the user wants it.
* doc/org.texi (Headlines): Mention the special behavior of C-k
in headlines.
Scott Otterson writes:
> For what must be the dozenth time, I've just accidentally deleted a
> large tree by typing C-k while in a headline.
>
> This is really easy to do because emacs users have "C-k deletes to the
> end of the line" worn deeply into their neural pathways -- it's so
> automatic for me that the keystroke is close to subconscious. A
> mistaken C-k is especially hard to detect because org-mode displays
> the result exactly like what your subconscious expects, that is, a
> collapsed headline is deleted to the end -- and the tree underneath is
> wiped out with no noticeable warning.
>
> Feature request: add an option preventing tree deletion with C-k
> without user confirmation. Actually, I'd like an option to prevent it
> period.
>
> If this option is already in there, then you're encouraged to tell me
> to RTFM. But then also please tell me where it is, because I can't
> find it.
Carsten replies
> This is now possible due to the variable
> `org-ctrl-k-protect-subtree'. But I predict that you are going to set
> it to nil again soon :D
Christian Egli
Eric Schulte
Carsten Dominik
Dan Davison
Bernt Hansen