Scot Beker writes:
> I cite my references in org like
> this.\autocite[231]{bibtexkey_2009}, where '231' is the
> relevant page number. When exporting to LaTeX, Org thinks
> that the value in square brackets is a footnote number and
> produces a document with a "footnote definition not found:
> 231" error message at the bottom of the document. My
> settings are below, and I've searched pretty hard through
> them to look for anything that might have caused it. Any
> ideas?
Matt Lundin writes:
> I have org-footnote-section set to "Footnotes." If I insert a new
> footnote while...
>
> 1. the "* Footnotes" tree already exists and
>
> 2. the "* Footnotes" tree is folded
>
> ...the footnote definition label is inserted, but the "* Footnotes"
> subtree remains folded and the cursor jumps to the "* Footnotes"
> headline rather than the definition line.
>
> I've tried using org-reveal (C-c C-r) to open the "Footnotes" section,
> but nothing happens. I've tried typing C-c C-c to go back to the
> footnote, but since the cursor is on a headline, the result is a tag
> prompt. When I hit TAB to cycle, the cursor remains on the headline.
Nick Dokos writes:
> I define a LaTeX macro at the top of my document, like so:
>
> ,----
> | ...
> | #+LATEX_HEADER: \newcommand{\rowstyle}[1]{\gdef\currentrowstyle{#1}%
> | #+LATEX_HEADER: #1\ignorespaces
> | #+LATEX_HEADER: }
> | ...
> `----
>
> and export - I get the following inserted:
>
> ,----
> | ...
> | \begin{document}
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | \$\^{}{1}\$ FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 1
> | ...
> `----
>
> Obviously, the macro argument spec is mistaken for a footnote.
Customize the new variable org-footnote-auto-adjust or use the STARTUP
option fnadjust to get automatic renumbering and sorting of footnotes
after each insertion/deletion.
This commit adds a new action to the footnote actions:
It allows to renumber footnote marks that have the simple form
fn:N where N is a number. After this action, numbers will start from
1 and increase through the document.
With the "* Footnotes" heading as last line in the buffer, footnote
insertion did not position new definitions correctly. This commit
fixes the problem.
Reported by Matt Lundin.
Sorting footnotes used to be almost like normalization, in that all
footnotes would be collected into a single location. Now sorting
respects the setting of `org-footnote-section'. If that is nil,
sorting will actually move each footnote into the outline node of its
first reference.
This commit add a new face for footnote labels, and activates footnote
labels for mouse clicks and for `C-c C-o', to jump to the
corresponding reference or definition.
This patch implements fully automatic creation of unique labels for
footnotes, which is also turned on as the default setting. The
automatic labels look like [fn:1], [fn:2], etc, using the first
available unused number.
The commit introduces a new variable, `org-footnote-auto-label' with a
number of different options ranging from no auto creation (prompting
the user for a label) to fully automatic creation.
Also, the commit introduces new #+STARTUP options that can be used to
select these settings on a per-file basis.
There was a bug with documents with more than one anonymous footnotes,
which would all end up to reference the first one only. The patch
fixes this problem.
Setting org-footnote-section to nil now causes definitions to be
inserted at the end of the current outline node, instead of into a
special node names "Footnotes".
Carsten Dominik
Bernt Hansen