ADD reaction kinetics results paragraphs
This commit is contained in:
parent
8126156630
commit
07644e1724
|
@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
|
|||
\newacronym{tmb}{TMB}{3,3',5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine}
|
||||
\newacronym{gvhd}{GVHD}{graft-vs-host disease}
|
||||
\newacronym{bcma}{BCMA}{B-cell maturation antigen}
|
||||
\newacronym{di}{DI}{deionized}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% SI units for uber nerds
|
||||
|
@ -951,6 +952,8 @@ transferred to another 96 well plate wherein expansion continued.
|
|||
% METHOD snb decay curve generation and analysis (including the equation used to
|
||||
% fit the data)
|
||||
|
||||
% METHOD add reaction kinetics diffusion mathy stuff
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Luminex Analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
Luminex was performed using a \product{ProcartaPlex kit}{\thermo}{custom} for
|
||||
|
@ -1148,7 +1151,38 @@ higher, further showing that the decay of \gls{snb} is not a concern.
|
|||
\label{fig:dms_flowchart}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
% RESULT add paragraph explaining the reaction kinetics stuff
|
||||
We also investigated the reaction kinetics of all three coating steps.
|
||||
|
||||
To quantify the reaction kinetics of the biotin binding step, we reacted
|
||||
multiple batches of microcarriers at \gls{rt} with
|
||||
\gls{20}{\mg\of{\carrier}\per\ml} with \gls{snb} in parallel and sacrificially
|
||||
analyzed each at varying timepoints using the \gls{haba} assay. This was
|
||||
performed at two different concentrations. We observed that for either
|
||||
concentration, the reaction was over in \SIrange{20}{30}{\minute}
|
||||
(\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_mass}). Furthermore, when put in terms of fraction of
|
||||
input \gls{snb}, we observed that the curves are almost identical
|
||||
(\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_frac}). Given this, the reaction step for biotin
|
||||
attached was set to \gls{30}{\minute}.
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO these numbers might be totally incorrect
|
||||
Next, we quantified the amount of \gls{stp} reacted with the surface of the
|
||||
biotin-coated microcarriers. Different batches of biotin-coated \glspl{dms} were
|
||||
coated with \SI{40}{\ug\per\ml} \gls{stp} and sampled at various timepoints
|
||||
using the \gls{bca} assay to indirectly quantify the amount of attached
|
||||
\gls{stp} mass. We found this reaction took \SI{45}{\minute}
|
||||
(\cref{fig:dms_stp_per_time}).
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO find real numbers for this
|
||||
Finally, we used the reaction data from the \gls{stp} binding curve to estimate
|
||||
the \gls{mab} binding curve. Assuming a quasi-steady-state paradigm, we
|
||||
estimated that the diffusion rate coefficient for the microcarriers was
|
||||
{\#}{diffusion rate}. Using this diffusion rate and the maximum mass of
|
||||
\glspl{mab} bound the microcarriers (\cref{fig:mab_coating}), we estimated that
|
||||
the \gls{mab} reaction should proceed in {\#}{mab curve}.
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO add additional paragraph about how this diffusion coefficient was used to
|
||||
% estimate the wash step times.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue