ADD metaanslysis effects figure

tex/thesis.tex

@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
 \newcommand{\ptk}{\cdp{8}}
 \newcommand{\ptmemh}{\pth\ptmem}
 \newcommand{\ptmemk}{\ptk\ptmem}
+\newcommand{\dpth}{$\Updelta$\cdp{4}}
 
 \newcommand{\catnum}[2]{(#1, #2)}
 \newcommand{\product}[3]{#1 \catnum{#2}{#3}}
@@ -1127,7 +1128,28 @@ beads in a variety of conditions}
   \input{../tables/causal_inference_control.tex}
 \end{table}
 
-% meta-analysis regression effect sizes
+\begin{figure*}[ht!]
+  \begingroup
+
+  \includegraphics{../figures/metaanalysis_effects.png}
+  \phantomsubcaption\label{fig:metaanalysis_fx_exp}
+  \phantomsubcaption\label{fig:metaanalysis_fx_mem}
+  \phantomsubcaption\label{fig:metaanalysis_fx_cd4}
+
+  \endgroup
+  \caption[Meta-analysis effect sizes]
+  {\glspl{dms} exhibit superior performance compared to beads controlling for
+    many experimental and process conditions. Effect sizes for
+    \subcap{fig:metaanalysis_fx_exp}{fold change},
+    \subcap{fig:metaanalysis_fx_mem}{\ptmem{} cells}, and
+    \subcap{fig:metaanalysis_fx_cd4}{\dpth{} cells}. The dotted line represents
+    the mean of the bead population. The red and blue dots represent the effect
+    size of using \gls{dms} instead of beads only considering treatment
+    variables (\cref{tab:ci_treat}) or treatment and control variables
+    (\cref{tab:ci_controlled}) respectively.
+  }
+  \label{fig:nonstick}
+\end{figure*}
 
 \section{discussion}