ADD regression tables to integrin figures

tables/integrin_1_reg.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
+% Date and time: Sat, Jul 31, 2021 - 12:17:04 PM
+\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
+\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
+\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+\\[-1.8ex] & \ptmemp{} \% & \pthp{} \\ 
+\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+ CD49a & 0.034 & 34.500 \\ 
+  CD49b & 0.024 & 397.000 \\ 
+  Constant & 0.313$^{***}$ & 1,233.250$^{***}$ \\ 
+ \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+Observations & 8 & 8 \\ 
+R$^{2}$ & 0.222 & 0.270 \\ 
+Adjusted R$^{2}$ & $-$0.089 & $-$0.022 \\ 
+\hline 
+\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\ 
+\end{tabular} 

tables/integrin_2_reg.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
+% Date and time: Sat, Jul 31, 2021 - 12:26:08 PM
+\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
+\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
+\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+\\[-1.8ex] & \ptmemp{} & \pthp{} \\ 
+\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+ CD49a & 0.006 & $-$0.006 \\ 
+  CD49b & 0.007 & $-$0.015 \\ 
+  Constant & 0.105$^{***}$ & 0.272$^{***}$ \\ 
+ \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+Observations & 12 & 12 \\ 
+R$^{2}$ & 0.082 & $-$0.153 \\ 
+\hline 
+\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
+\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\ 
+\end{tabular} 

tex/thesis.tex

@@ -2984,11 +2984,19 @@ them to grow better in the \gls{dms} system.
       time with each blocking condition.}
     \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_mem}{\ptmemp{} at day 14 for each blocked condition.}
     \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_cd49}{\gls{a2b1} and \gls{a2b2} expression over time.}
+    `A' and `B' refer to the inclusion of \anti{\gls{a2b1}} or \anti{\gls{a2b2}}
+    respectively.
   }
   \label{fig:integrin_1}
 \end{figure*}
 
-% TABLE add regression table showing the results from this analysis
+% RESULT alude to these tables
+
+\begin{table}[!h] \centering
+  \caption{Linear regression for day 14 phenotype shown in \cref{fig:integrin_1}}
+  \label{tab:integrin_1_reg}
+  \input{../tables/integrin_1_reg.tex}
+\end{table}
 
 We tested this hypothesis by adding blocking \glspl{mab} against \gls{a2b1}
 and/or \gls{a2b2} to running T cell cultures activated using the \glspl{dms}.
@@ -3016,10 +3024,18 @@ of the groups (\cref{fig:inegrin_1_mem}). We also noted that \gls{a2b1} and
     \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_fc}{Fold change of \gls{dms}-activated T cell over
       time with each blocking condition.}
     \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_mem}{\ptmemp{} at day 14 for each blocked condition.}
+    `A' and `B' refer to the inclusion of \anti{\gls{a2b1}} or \anti{\gls{a2b2}}
+    respectively.
   }
   \label{fig:integrin_2}
 \end{figure*}
 
+\begin{table}[!h] \centering
+  \caption{Linear regression for day 14 phenotype shown in \cref{fig:integrin_2}}
+  \label{tab:integrin_2_reg}
+  \input{../tables/integrin_2_reg.tex}
+\end{table}
+
 Since this last experiment gave a negative result, we decided to hit \gls{a2b1}
 and \gls{a2b2} harder by adding blocking \glspl{mab} at more timepoints between
 day 0 and day 6, hypothesizing that the majority of the signaling would be