ADD method for meta-analysis

This commit is contained in:
Nathan Dwarshuis 2021-07-28 13:57:15 -04:00
parent 4994343432
commit 21eab442ee
1 changed files with 30 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -100,6 +100,8 @@
\newacronym{moi}{MOI}{multiplicity of infection}
\newacronym{ifng}{IFN$\upgamma$}{interferon-$\upgamma$}
\newacronym{tnfa}{TNF$\upalpha$}{tumor necrosis factor-$\upalpha$}
\newacronym{sql}{SQL}{structured query language}
\newacronym{fcs}{FCS}{flow cytometry standard}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% SI units for uber nerds
@ -1056,6 +1058,34 @@ via a Biorad Bioplex 200 plate reader.
\input{../tables/luminex_panel.tex}
\end{table}
\subsection{data aggregation and meta-analysis}
In order to perform meta-analysis on all experimental data generate using the
\gls{dms} system, we developed a program to curate and aggregate the raw
datafiles into a \gls{sql} database.
% FIGURE summarize this stuff in a picture
The data files to be aggregated included Microsoft Excel files which held
timeseries measurements for cell cultures (eg cell counts, viability, glucose,
\gls{il2} added, media added, and media removed), \gls{fcs} files for cellular
phenotypes, and FlowJo files which held gating parameters and statistics based
on the \gls{fcs} files. Additional information which was held in electronic lab
notebooks (eg OneNote files) was not easily parsable, and thus this data was
summarized in YAML files. The data included in these YAML files included reagent
characteristics (vendor, catalog number, lot number, manufacturing date), cell
donor characteristics (age, \gls{bmi}, phenotype, demographic, gender), and all
experimental parameters such as the number of bead or \gls{dms} added.
% FIGURE data model
To aggregate the data in a database, we wrote a program using Python, R, and
Docker which retrieved the data from its source location and inserted the data
in a Postgres database. This program included checks to ensure the integrity of
source data (for example, flagging entries which had a reagent whose
manufacturing date was after the date the experiment started, which signifies a
human input error).
\subsection{statistical analysis}
For 1-way \gls{anova} analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons test,
@ -1077,9 +1107,6 @@ lack-of-fit tests where replicates were present (to assess model fit in the
context of pure error). Statistical significance was evaluated at $\upalpha$ =
0.05.
% METHOD add meta-analysis
% METHOD add Grex
\section{results}
\subsection{DMSs can be fabricated in a controlled manner}