ENH reference the crappy QC data we made
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d789afe00
commit
5e9dfa7a50
|
@ -4699,12 +4699,11 @@ Using varying surface densities that are matched per-area between the beads and
|
|||
\glspl{dms} we can then activate T cells and assess their growth/phenotype as a
|
||||
function of surface density and the presentation method.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIGURE this might warrant a better figure
|
||||
\subsection{Reducing Ligand Variance}
|
||||
|
||||
While we have robust quality control steps to quantify each step of the
|
||||
\gls{dms} coating process, we still see high variance across time and personnel.
|
||||
This is less than ideal for translation.
|
||||
\gls{dms} coating process, we still see high variance across time and personnel
|
||||
(\cref{fig:dms_coating}). This is less than ideal for translation.
|
||||
|
||||
When investigating the \gls{mab} and \gls{stp} binding, it appears that there is
|
||||
a significant variance both between and within different experiments (even
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue