ADD figures to aim 2b
After Width: | Height: | Size: 114 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 404 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 195 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 162 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 181 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 111 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 77 KiB |
144
tex/thesis.tex
|
@ -85,6 +85,9 @@
|
|||
\newacronym{a2b2}{A2B2}{integrin $\upalpha$1$\upbeta$2}
|
||||
\newacronym{til}{TIL}{tumor infiltrating lymphocytes}
|
||||
\newacronym{nsg}{NSG}{NOD scid gamma}
|
||||
\newacronym{colb}{COL-B}{collagenase B}
|
||||
\newacronym{cold}{COL-D}{collagenase D}
|
||||
\newacronym{tsne}{tSNE}{t-stochastic neighbor embedding}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% SI units for uber nerds
|
||||
|
@ -718,7 +721,7 @@ entailed adding sterile \gls{pbs} in a 10:1 volumetric ratio, agitating at
|
|||
reaction volume.
|
||||
|
||||
To coat with \gls{stp}, \SI{40}{\ug\per\mL} \product{\gls{stp}}{Jackson
|
||||
Immunoresearch}{ 016-000-114} was added and allowed to react for
|
||||
Immunoresearch}{016-000-114} was added and allowed to react for
|
||||
\SI{60}{\minute} at \SI{700}{RPM} of agitation. After the reaction, supernatant
|
||||
was taken for the \gls{bca} assay, and the carriers were washed analogously to
|
||||
the previous wash step to remove the biotin, except two washes were done and the
|
||||
|
@ -1063,6 +1066,8 @@ cells after \SI{14}{\day} were on the interior surface of the \glspl{dms}
|
|||
|
||||
%, and this did not significantly change with initial seeding density (Supplemental Table 1).
|
||||
|
||||
% FIGURE caspase/bcl2 figure
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO add this to the methods section
|
||||
% TODO double check the timing of this experiment (it might not be day 14)
|
||||
% TODO provide the regression results and coefficients from this
|
||||
|
@ -1553,6 +1558,7 @@ provide these benefits.
|
|||
|
||||
\subsection{DOE shows optimal conditions for expanded potent T cells}
|
||||
|
||||
% FIGURE IL2 modulation figure
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO not all of these were actually use, explain why by either adding columns
|
||||
% or marking with an asterisk
|
||||
|
@ -1642,6 +1648,142 @@ provide these benefits.
|
|||
\section{introduction}
|
||||
\section{methods}
|
||||
\section{results}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{adding or removing DMSs alters expansion and phenotype}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO this figure is tall and skinny like me
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/collagenase.png}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[Effects Collagenase Treatment on T cells]
|
||||
{T cells treated with either \gls{colb}, \gls{cold}, or buffer and then
|
||||
stained for various surface markers and analyzing via flow cytometry.}
|
||||
\label{fig:collagenase_fx}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO this figure still says "carrier"
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/add_remove_endpoint.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:add_rem_growth}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:add_rem_viability}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:add_rem_cd4}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[Endpoint results from adding/removing \gls{dms} on day 4]
|
||||
{Changing \gls{dms} concentration on day 4 has profound effects on phenotype
|
||||
and growth.
|
||||
\subcap{fig:add_rem_growth}{Longitudinal fold change},
|
||||
\subcap{fig:add_rem_viability}{longitudinal viability}, and
|
||||
\subcap{fig:add_rem_cd4}{day 14 \pthp{}} of T cell cultures with \glspl{dms}
|
||||
added, removed, or kept the same on day 4.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:add_rem}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO this needs some better annotations
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/add_remove_spade.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:spade_msts}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:spade_tsne_all}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:spade_tsne_stem}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:spade_quant}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[SPADE and tSNE analysis temporally-modified DMS concentration]
|
||||
{Removing \glspl{dms} leads to a higher fraction of potent stem-memory T
|
||||
cells compared to both adding and not changing the \gls{dms} concentration
|
||||
at day 4.
|
||||
\subcap{fig:spade_msts}{SPADE plots of CD4, CD45RA, CD27, and CD45RO
|
||||
expression on T cells. All cells from the added, removed, or no change
|
||||
groups were pooled and clustered at once.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:spade_tsne_all}{\gls{tsne} plots of all cells pooled from all
|
||||
groups.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:spade_tsne_stem}{\gls{tsne} plots of T cells from all groups
|
||||
manually gated on \cdp{8}\cdp{27}\cdp{45RO}.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:spade_quant}{T cells from SPADE plots clustered by expression in
|
||||
(\subref{fig:spade_msts}) quantified against total cell number from each
|
||||
group.}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:spade}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{blocking integrin binding does not alter expansion or phenotype}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO perhaps these figs should be combined
|
||||
% TODO actually make the captions for these
|
||||
% TODO add some background into why integrins are important and the proposed mechanism
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/integrin_1.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_fc}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_mem}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_cd49}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[Integrin blocking I]
|
||||
{Blocking with integrin does not lead to differences in memory or growth.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:integrin_1}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/integrin_2.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_2_fc}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_2_mem}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[Integrin blocking II]
|
||||
{Blocking with integrin does not lead to differences in memory or growth.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:integrin_2}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{blocking IL15 signaling does not alter expansion or phenotype}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO actually add captions
|
||||
% TODO add fold change and viability to these
|
||||
% TODO maybe combine these
|
||||
% TODO add some background into why IL15 is important and the proposed mechanism
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/il15_blockade_1.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:il15_1_fc}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:il15_1_viability}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:il15_1_mem}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[IL15 blocking I]
|
||||
{Blocking with IL15 does not lead to differences in memory or growth.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:il15_1}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/il15_blockade_2.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:il15_2_fc}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:il15_2_viability}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:il15_2_mem}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[IL15 blocking II]
|
||||
{Blocking with IL15 does not lead to differences in memory or growth.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:il15_2}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{discussion}
|
||||
|
||||
\chapter{aim 3}\label{aim3}
|
||||
|
|