ENH make section headers one line and pretty
This commit is contained in:
parent
f30399869f
commit
89baa4f970
|
@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ using retro- or lentiviral vectors as their means of gene-editing must be tested
|
||||||
for replication competent vectors\cite{Wang2013} and for contamination via
|
for replication competent vectors\cite{Wang2013} and for contamination via
|
||||||
bacteria or other pathogens.
|
bacteria or other pathogens.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{T cell Activation Methods}\label{sec:background_activation}
|
\subsection{T Cell Activation Methods}\label{sec:background_activation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order for T cells to be expanded \exvivo{} they must be activated with a
|
In order for T cells to be expanded \exvivo{} they must be activated with a
|
||||||
stimulatory signal (Signal 1) and a costimulatory signal (Signal 2). \Invivo{},
|
stimulatory signal (Signal 1) and a costimulatory signal (Signal 2). \Invivo{},
|
||||||
|
@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ water prior to adding it to the microcarrier suspension (which itself is in
|
||||||
\label{fig:dms_kinetics}
|
\label{fig:dms_kinetics}
|
||||||
\end{figure*}
|
\end{figure*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Reaction Kinetics for Coating the DMSs}
|
\subsection{DMS Process Has Defined Reaction Kinetics}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We investigated the reaction kinetics of all three coating steps (accompanying
|
We investigated the reaction kinetics of all three coating steps (accompanying
|
||||||
MATLAB codes are provided in \cref{sec:appendix_binding}). To quantify the
|
MATLAB codes are provided in \cref{sec:appendix_binding}). To quantify the
|
||||||
|
@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ one that could be optimized).
|
||||||
MATLAB code and output for all the wash step calculations are given in
|
MATLAB code and output for all the wash step calculations are given in
|
||||||
\cref{sec:appendix_washing}.
|
\cref{sec:appendix_washing}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMSs can efficiently expand T cells compared to beads}
|
\subsection{DMSs Can Efficiently Expand T Cells Compared to Beads}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||||
\begingroup
|
\begingroup
|
||||||
|
@ -2284,7 +2284,6 @@ expansion by lowering apoptosis of the cells in culture.
|
||||||
\input{../tables/inside_fraction_regression.tex}
|
\input{../tables/inside_fraction_regression.tex}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% RESULT state the CI of what are inside the carriers
|
|
||||||
We also asked how many cells were inside the \glspl{dms} vs. free-floating in
|
We also asked how many cells were inside the \glspl{dms} vs. free-floating in
|
||||||
suspension and/or loosely attached to the surface. We qualitatively verified the
|
suspension and/or loosely attached to the surface. We qualitatively verified the
|
||||||
presence of cells inside the \glspl{dms} using a \gls{mtt} stain to opaquely
|
presence of cells inside the \glspl{dms} using a \gls{mtt} stain to opaquely
|
||||||
|
@ -2299,7 +2298,7 @@ regression on this data revealed that the percentage of T cells inside the
|
||||||
\glspl{dms} does not depend on the initial starting cell density (at least when
|
\glspl{dms} does not depend on the initial starting cell density (at least when
|
||||||
harvested after \SI{14}{\day}) (\cref{tab:inside_regression}).
|
harvested after \SI{14}{\day}) (\cref{tab:inside_regression}).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMSs lead to greater expansion and memory and CD4+ phenotypes}
|
\subsection{DMSs Lead to Greater Expansion and High-Quality Phenotypes}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||||
\begingroup
|
\begingroup
|
||||||
|
@ -2388,7 +2387,7 @@ indicate the \gls{dms} platform has the capacity to expand higher numbers and
|
||||||
percentages of highly potent \ptmem{} and \pth{} T cells compared to
|
percentages of highly potent \ptmem{} and \pth{} T cells compared to
|
||||||
state-of-the-art bead technology.
|
state-of-the-art bead technology.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection*{DMSs can be used to produce functional CAR T cells}
|
\subsection{DMSs Produce Functional CAR T Cells}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
After optimizing for naïve/memory and CD4 yield, we sought to determine if the
|
After optimizing for naïve/memory and CD4 yield, we sought to determine if the
|
||||||
\glspl{dms} were compatible with lentiviral transduction protocols used to
|
\glspl{dms} were compatible with lentiviral transduction protocols used to
|
||||||
|
@ -2489,7 +2488,7 @@ for bead (\cref{fig:car_bcma_total}).
|
||||||
\label{fig:car_bcma}
|
\label{fig:car_bcma}
|
||||||
\end{figure*}
|
\end{figure*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMSs efficiently expand T cells in Grex bioreactors}
|
\subsection{DMSs Efficiently Expand T Cells in Grex Bioreactors}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||||
\begingroup
|
\begingroup
|
||||||
|
@ -2556,7 +2555,7 @@ in Grex bioreactors, although more optimization may be necessary to maximize the
|
||||||
media feed rate and growth area to get comparable results to those seen in
|
media feed rate and growth area to get comparable results to those seen in
|
||||||
tissue-culture plates.
|
tissue-culture plates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMSs do not leave antibodies attached to cell product}
|
\subsection{DMSs Do Not Leave Antibodies Attached to Cell Product}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||||
\begingroup
|
\begingroup
|
||||||
|
@ -2581,8 +2580,7 @@ not detect the presence of either \ahcd{3} or \ahcd{28} \glspl{mab} (both of
|
||||||
which were \gls{igg}) on the final T cell product after \SI{14}{\day} of
|
which were \gls{igg}) on the final T cell product after \SI{14}{\day} of
|
||||||
expansion (\cref{fig:nonstick}).
|
expansion (\cref{fig:nonstick}).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMSs consistently outperform bead-based expansion compared to
|
\subsection{DMSs Outperform Beads in a Variety of Conditions}
|
||||||
beads in a variety of conditions}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to establish the robustness of our method, we combined all experiments
|
In order to establish the robustness of our method, we combined all experiments
|
||||||
performed in our lab using beads or \glspl{dms} and combined them into one
|
performed in our lab using beads or \glspl{dms} and combined them into one
|
||||||
|
@ -2915,7 +2913,7 @@ additional samples (\cref{fig:mod_overview_doe}). Process parameters for the
|
||||||
\si{\IU\per\ml}), \pdms{} (500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500
|
\si{\IU\per\ml}), \pdms{} (500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500
|
||||||
\si{\dms\per\ml}), and \pmab{} (\SI{100}{\percent}) (\cref{fig:mod_overview}).
|
\si{\dms\per\ml}), and \pmab{} (\SI{100}{\percent}) (\cref{fig:mod_overview}).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMS fabrication}
|
\subsection{DMS Fabrication}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\glspl{dms} were fabricated as described in \cref{sec:dms_fab} with the
|
\glspl{dms} were fabricated as described in \cref{sec:dms_fab} with the
|
||||||
following modifications in order to obtain a variable functional \gls{mab}
|
following modifications in order to obtain a variable functional \gls{mab}
|
||||||
|
@ -3119,7 +3117,7 @@ a Venn diagram from the \inlinecode{venn} R package.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Results}
|
\section{Results}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{T Cells Can be Grown on DMSs with Lower IL2 Concentrations}
|
\subsection{DMSs Grow T Cells With Lower IL2 Concentrations}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Prior to the main experiments in this aim, we performed a preliminary experiment
|
Prior to the main experiments in this aim, we performed a preliminary experiment
|
||||||
to assess the effect of lowering the \gls{il2} concentration on the T cells
|
to assess the effect of lowering the \gls{il2} concentration on the T cells
|
||||||
|
@ -3176,7 +3174,7 @@ advantage at lower \gls{il2} concentrations compared to beads. For this reason,
|
||||||
we decided to investigate the lower range of \gls{il2} concentrations starting
|
we decided to investigate the lower range of \gls{il2} concentrations starting
|
||||||
at \SI{10}{\IU\per\ml} throughout the remainder of this aim.
|
at \SI{10}{\IU\per\ml} throughout the remainder of this aim.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DOE Shows Optimal Conditions for Expanded Potent T Cells}
|
\subsection{DOE Shows Optimal Conditions for Potent T Cells}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% TABLE not all of these were actually used, explain why by either adding columns
|
% TABLE not all of these were actually used, explain why by either adding columns
|
||||||
% or marking with an asterisk
|
% or marking with an asterisk
|
||||||
|
@ -3364,8 +3362,7 @@ combinations at and around this optimum were tested, the model nonetheless
|
||||||
showed that there were no other optimal values or regions elsewhere in the
|
showed that there were no other optimal values or regions elsewhere in the
|
||||||
model.
|
model.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Modeling With Artificial Intelligence Methods Reveals Potential
|
\subsection{Modeling with Machine Learning Reveals Putative CQAs}
|
||||||
CQAs}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Due to the heterogeneity of the multivariate data collected and knowing that no
|
Due to the heterogeneity of the multivariate data collected and knowing that no
|
||||||
single model is perfect for all applications, we implemented an agnostic
|
single model is perfect for all applications, we implemented an agnostic
|
||||||
|
@ -3686,7 +3683,7 @@ Adding \glspl{dms} was relatively much simpler; the number of \gls{dms} used per
|
||||||
area on day 0 was scaled up by 3 on day 4 to match the change from a 96 well
|
area on day 0 was scaled up by 3 on day 4 to match the change from a 96 well
|
||||||
plate to a 24 well plate, effectively producing a constant activation signal.
|
plate to a 24 well plate, effectively producing a constant activation signal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Mass Wytometry and Clustering Analysis}
|
\subsection{Mass Cytometry and Clustering Analysis}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
T cells were stained using a \product{34 \gls{cytof} marker
|
T cells were stained using a \product{34 \gls{cytof} marker
|
||||||
panel}{Fluidigm}{201322} and \product{cisplatin}{Fluidigm}{201064} which were
|
panel}{Fluidigm}{201322} and \product{cisplatin}{Fluidigm}{201064} which were
|
||||||
|
@ -3867,7 +3864,7 @@ leads to potentially higher expansion, lower \pthp{}, and higher fraction of
|
||||||
lower differentiated T cells such as \gls{tscm}, and adding \gls{dms} seems to
|
lower differentiated T cells such as \gls{tscm}, and adding \gls{dms} seems to
|
||||||
do the inverse.
|
do the inverse.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Blocking Integrin Binding Does not Alter Expansion or Phenotype}
|
\subsection{Blocking Integrin Does Not Alter Expansion or Phenotype}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One of the reasons the \gls{dms} platform might perform better than the beads is
|
One of the reasons the \gls{dms} platform might perform better than the beads is
|
||||||
the fact that they are composed of gelatin, which is a collagen derivative. The
|
the fact that they are composed of gelatin, which is a collagen derivative. The
|
||||||
|
@ -3957,7 +3954,7 @@ CD4, or CD8) were statistically different between groups
|
||||||
Taken together, these data suggest that the advantage of the \gls{dms} platform
|
Taken together, these data suggest that the advantage of the \gls{dms} platform
|
||||||
is not due to signaling through \gls{a2b1} or \gls{a2b2}.
|
is not due to signaling through \gls{a2b1} or \gls{a2b2}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Blocking IL15 Signaling does not Alter Expansion or Phenotype}
|
\subsection{Blocking IL15 Does Not Alter Expansion or Phenotype}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\gls{il15} is a cytokine responsible for memory T cell survival and maintenance.
|
\gls{il15} is a cytokine responsible for memory T cell survival and maintenance.
|
||||||
Furthermore, we observed in other experiments that it is secreted to a much
|
Furthermore, we observed in other experiments that it is secreted to a much
|
||||||
|
@ -4175,7 +4172,6 @@ lower-differentiated T cells with higher potency\cite{Ghassemi2018}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
T cells were grown as described in \cref{sec:tcellculture}.
|
T cells were grown as described in \cref{sec:tcellculture}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{\Invivo{} Therapeutic Efficacy in NSG Mice Model}
|
\subsection{\Invivo{} Therapeutic Efficacy in NSG Mice Model}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% METHOD describe how the luciferase cells were generated (eg the kwong lab)
|
% METHOD describe how the luciferase cells were generated (eg the kwong lab)
|
||||||
|
@ -4226,8 +4222,7 @@ between survival groups.
|
||||||
\input{../tables/mouse_dose_car.tex}
|
\input{../tables/mouse_dose_car.tex}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{DMS-expanded T Cells Show Greater Anti-Tumor Activity \invivo{}
|
\subsection{DMSs Lead to Greater \invivo{} Anti-Tumor Activity}
|
||||||
Compared to Beads}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||||
\begingroup
|
\begingroup
|
||||||
|
@ -4273,7 +4268,7 @@ between survival groups.
|
||||||
\subcap{fig:mouse_dosing_ivis_survival_full}{The same data as
|
\subcap{fig:mouse_dosing_ivis_survival_full}{The same data as
|
||||||
\subref{fig:mouse_dosing_ivis_survival} except showing the full time until
|
\subref{fig:mouse_dosing_ivis_survival} except showing the full time until
|
||||||
euthanasia for all mice (including those that died via \gls{gvhd}). Survival
|
euthanasia for all mice (including those that died via \gls{gvhd}). Survival
|
||||||
curves were statistically analyzed using the logrank test in GraphPad
|
curves were statistically analyzed using the Mantel-Cox test in GraphPad
|
||||||
Prism.}
|
Prism.}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\label{fig:mouse_dosing_ivis}
|
\label{fig:mouse_dosing_ivis}
|
||||||
|
@ -4693,7 +4688,7 @@ cytokine is undetectable, this indicates that the blocking \gls{mab} completely
|
||||||
quenched all target cytokine at the time of addition and in the time between
|
quenched all target cytokine at the time of addition and in the time between
|
||||||
feeding cycles.
|
feeding cycles.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Interior cell phenotype}
|
\subsubsection{Interior Cell Phenotype}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Unlike the beads, the \glspl{dms} have interior and exterior surfaces. We
|
Unlike the beads, the \glspl{dms} have interior and exterior surfaces. We
|
||||||
demonstrated that some T cell expand on the interior of the \glspl{dms}, and is
|
demonstrated that some T cell expand on the interior of the \glspl{dms}, and is
|
||||||
|
@ -4820,7 +4815,6 @@ potential mitigation strategies:
|
||||||
due to its automated nature.
|
due to its automated nature.
|
||||||
\end{description}
|
\end{description}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Surface Stiffness}
|
\subsubsection{Surface Stiffness}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The beads and \gls{dms} are composed of different materials: iron/polymer in the
|
The beads and \gls{dms} are composed of different materials: iron/polymer in the
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue