diff --git a/figures/integrin_1.svg b/figures/integrin_1.svg
index 9363d49..17ad340 100644
--- a/figures/integrin_1.svg
+++ b/figures/integrin_1.svg
@@ -18,6 +18,48 @@
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -68,9 +110,9 @@
borderopacity="1.0"
inkscape:pageopacity="1"
inkscape:pageshadow="2"
- inkscape:zoom="1.979899"
- inkscape:cx="258.85159"
- inkscape:cy="177.02923"
+ inkscape:zoom="3.959798"
+ inkscape:cx="139.90613"
+ inkscape:cy="86.999387"
inkscape:document-units="px"
inkscape:current-layer="layer1"
showgrid="true"
@@ -108,7 +150,7 @@
+ transform="matrix(1.3333333,0,0,-1.3333333,240.0267,160.6)">
+ transform="matrix(1.3333333,0,0,-1.3333333,9.9200128,321.65335)">
+ transform="matrix(1.3333333,0,0,-1.3333333,236.30669,328.73335)">
b.
+ x="1.6358956"
+ y="170.45758">c.
c.
+ x="224.57033"
+ y="170.45758">d.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ D0
+ D6
+ D14
+ Activate
+ Harvest
+
+ Add anti-CD49a/b(10mg/ml)
+ b.
diff --git a/figures/integrin_2.svg b/figures/integrin_2.svg
index 7a8a6aa..cc99340 100644
--- a/figures/integrin_2.svg
+++ b/figures/integrin_2.svg
@@ -46,6 +46,76 @@
d="m 43.53,21.82 h 90.2 v 86.08 h -90.2 z"
id="path27191" />
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ transform="matrix(1.3333333,0,0,-1.3333333,6.600013,271.86668)">
+ transform="matrix(1.3333333,0,0,-1.3333333,245.81337,273.50668)">
a.
+ x="-1.453125"
+ y="121.64001">b.
a.
+ b.
+ x="239.0667"
+ y="121.64001">c.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ D0
+ D6
+ D4
+ D2
+ D14
+ Activate
+ Harvest
+
+
+
+
+ Add anti-CD49a/b(10mg/ml)
diff --git a/tex/thesis.tex b/tex/thesis.tex
index b0af664..85a8294 100644
--- a/tex/thesis.tex
+++ b/tex/thesis.tex
@@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ used this in subsequent processes.
binding curve of \subcap{fig:biotin_coating}{biotin},
\subcap{fig:stp_coating}{\gls{stp}}, and
\subcap{fig:mab_coating}{\glspl{mab}} as a function of biotin added. }
- \label{fig:dms_flowchart}
+ \label{fig:dms_coating}
\end{figure*}
% TODO these caption titles suck
@@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ bead over \SI{14}{\day} and had similar viability
(\cref{fig:grex_results_fc,fig:grex_results_viability}). Furthermore, consistent
with past results, \glspl{dms}-expanded T cells had higher \pthp{} compared to
beads, but only had slightly higher \ptmemp{} compared to beads
-(\cref{fig:grex_phenotype}).
+(\cref{fig:grex_mem,fig:grex_cd4}).
% TODO is this discussion stuff?
These discrepancies might be explained in light of our other data as follows.
@@ -2957,6 +2957,7 @@ them to grow better in the \gls{dms} system.
\begingroup
\includegraphics{../figures/integrin_1.png}
+ \phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_overview}
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_fc}
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_mem}
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_1_cd49}
@@ -2964,6 +2965,11 @@ them to grow better in the \gls{dms} system.
\endgroup
\caption[Integrin blocking I]
{Blocking with integrin does not lead to differences in memory or growth.
+ \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_overview}{Experimental overview}
+ \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_fc}{Fold change of \gls{dms}-activated T cell over
+ time with each blocking condition.}
+ \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_mem}{\ptmemp{} at day 14 for each blocked condition.}
+ \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_cd49}{\gls{a2b1} and \gls{a2b2} expression over time.}
}
\label{fig:integrin_1}
\end{figure*}
@@ -2986,12 +2992,16 @@ of the groups (\cref{fig:inegrin_1_mem}). We also noted that \gls{a2b1} and
\begingroup
\includegraphics{../figures/integrin_2.png}
+ \phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_2_overview}
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_2_fc}
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:inegrin_2_mem}
\endgroup
\caption[Integrin blocking II]
{Blocking with integrin does not lead to differences in memory or growth.
+ \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_fc}{Fold change of \gls{dms}-activated T cell over
+ time with each blocking condition.}
+ \subcap{fig:inegrin_1_mem}{\ptmemp{} at day 14 for each blocked condition.}
}
\label{fig:integrin_2}
\end{figure*}