ENH split Cd19 car fig
This commit is contained in:
parent
138add8830
commit
b0dfe664c3
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 300 KiB After Width: | Height: | Size: 158 KiB |
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
After Width: | Height: | Size: 149 KiB |
|
@ -1937,7 +1937,6 @@ appeared that the \gls{mab} binding was quadratically related to biotin binding
|
|||
critical to controlling the amount and \glspl{mab} and thus the amount of signal
|
||||
the T cells receive downstream.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIGURE combine this DOE figure into one interaction plot
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2367,7 +2366,7 @@ generate \gls{car} T cells\cite{Tumaini2013, Lamers2014}. We added a
|
|||
\SI{24}{\hour} transduction step on day 1 of the \SI{14}{\day} expansion to
|
||||
insert an anti-CD19 \gls{car}\cite{Milone2009} and subsequently measured the
|
||||
surface expression of the \gls{car} on day 14
|
||||
(\cref{fig:car_production_flow_pl,fig:car_production_endpoint_pl}). We noted
|
||||
(\cref{fig:car_cd19_flow,fig:car_cd19_endpoint}). We noted
|
||||
that there was robust \gls{car} expression in over \SI{25}{\percent} of expanded
|
||||
T cells, and there was no observable difference in \gls{car} expression between
|
||||
beads and \glspl{dms}.
|
||||
|
@ -2380,7 +2379,7 @@ appearance of CD107a on CD8+ T cells. CD107a is found on the inner-surface of
|
|||
cytotoxic granules and will emerge on the surface after cytotoxic T cells are
|
||||
activated and degranulate. Indeed, we observed degranulation in T cells expanded
|
||||
with both beads and \glspl{dms}, although not to an observably different degree
|
||||
(\cref{fig:car_production_flow_degran,fig:car_production_endpoint_degran}).
|
||||
(\cref{fig:car_degran_flow,fig:car_degran_endpoint}).
|
||||
Taken together, these results indicated that the \glspl{dms} provide similar
|
||||
transduction efficiency compared to beads.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2389,7 +2388,7 @@ for CCL21; since \glspl{dms} produced a larger percentage of naïve and memory T
|
|||
cells (which have CCR7, the receptor for CCL21) we would expect higher migration
|
||||
in \gls{dms}-expanded cells vs.\ their bead counterparts. Indeed, we noted a
|
||||
significantly higher migration percentage for T cells grown using \glspl{dms}
|
||||
versus beads (\cref{fig:car_production_migration}). Interestingly, there also
|
||||
versus beads (\cref{fig:car_degran_migration}). Interestingly, there also
|
||||
appeared to be a decrease in CCL21 migration between transduced and untransduced
|
||||
T cells expanded using beads, but this interaction effect was only weakly
|
||||
significant (p = 0.068). No such effect was seen for \gls{dms}-expanded T cells,
|
||||
|
@ -2399,25 +2398,38 @@ showing that migration was likely independent of \gls{car} transduction.
|
|||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/car_production.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_production_flow_pl}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_production_endpoint_pl}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_production_flow_degran}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_production_endpoint_degran}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_production_migration}
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/car_cd19.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_cd19_flow}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_cd19_endpoint}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[\glspl{dms} lead to efficient CD19 transduction]
|
||||
{\glspl{dms} lead to efficient CD19 transduction.
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_cd19_flow}{Representative flow cytometry plot for
|
||||
transduced or untransduced T cells stained with \gls{ptnl}.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_cd19_endpoint}{Endpoint plots with \gls{anova} for
|
||||
transduced or untransduced T cells stained with \gls{ptnl}.}
|
||||
All data is from T cells expanded for \SI{14}{\day}.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:car_production}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
||||
\begingroup
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics{../figures/car_degranulation.png}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_degran_flow}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_degran_endpoint}
|
||||
\phantomsubcaption\label{fig:car_degran_migration}
|
||||
|
||||
\endgroup
|
||||
\caption[\glspl{dms} produce functional \gls{car} T cells]
|
||||
{\glspl{dms} produce functional \gls{car} T cells.
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_production_flow_pl}{Representative flow cytometry plot for
|
||||
transduced or untransduced T cells stained with \gls{ptnl}.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_production_endpoint_pl}{Endpoint plots with \gls{anova} for
|
||||
transduced or untransduced T cells stained with \gls{ptnl}.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_production_flow_degran}{Representative flow plot for
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_degran_flow}{Representative flow plot for
|
||||
degenerating T cells.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_production_endpoint_degran}{Endpoint plots for transduced or
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_degran_endpoint}{Endpoint plots for transduced or
|
||||
untransduced T cells stained with \cd{107a} for the degranulation assay.}
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_production_migration}{Endpoint plot for transmigration assay
|
||||
\subcap{fig:car_degran_migration}{Endpoint plot for transmigration assay
|
||||
with \gls{anova}.} All data is from T cells expanded for \SI{14}{\day}.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:car_production}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue