ENH use consistent symbols for equations
This commit is contained in:
parent
fbb09a07cf
commit
c76291de88
211
tex/thesis.tex
211
tex/thesis.tex
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
\usepackage{siunitx}
|
||||
\usepackage{multicol}
|
||||
\setlength{\columnsep}{1cm}
|
||||
\usepackage[acronym]{glossaries}
|
||||
\usepackage[acronym,toc,style=index]{glossaries}
|
||||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||||
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
||||
\usepackage{titlesec}
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +123,8 @@
|
|||
cells}]{#1}{T\textsubscript{#2}#4}{#3 T cell}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\renewcommand{\glossarysection}[2][]{} % remove glossary title
|
||||
\newglossary[slg]{symbolslist}{syi}{syg}{Symbolslist}
|
||||
|
||||
\makeglossaries
|
||||
|
||||
\tcellacronym{tn}{n}{naive}{}
|
||||
|
@ -244,6 +245,35 @@
|
|||
\newacronym{tocsy}{TOCSY}{total correlation spectroscopy}
|
||||
\newacronym{hplc}{HPLC}{high-performance liquid chromatography}
|
||||
|
||||
% symbols to make me sound mathier than I really am
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\evalat}[2]{#1\rvert_{#2}}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\newsymbol}[3]{
|
||||
\newglossaryentry{sym:#1}{name=\ensuremath{#2},
|
||||
description={#3},
|
||||
type=symbolslist}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\newsymbol{diff}{D}{diffusion coefficient of ligand}
|
||||
\newsymbol{appdiff}{D_{app}}{apparent diffusion coefficient of ligand}
|
||||
\newsymbol{geodiff}{\beta}{geometric diffusivity, which is a fractional
|
||||
parameter representing the tortuousity and void fraction of the microcarrier}
|
||||
\newsymbol{mcligconc}{C_{L,m}}{concentration of ligand in microcarrier}
|
||||
\newsymbol{bulkligconc}{C_{L,b}}{concentration of ligand outside microcarriers}
|
||||
\newsymbol{mcrecconc}{C_{R,m}}{concentration of receptor inside microcarriers}
|
||||
\newsymbol{flowrate}{Q}{molar flow rate of ligand}
|
||||
\newsymbol{mcflux}{N_{m}}{flux of ligand in microcarrier}
|
||||
\newsymbol{rad}{r}{radial position in the microcarrier}
|
||||
\newsymbol{interrad}{r_i}{radius of unbound:bound receptor interface in
|
||||
microcarriers}
|
||||
\newsymbol{intervol}{V_i}{volume of unbound:bound receptor interface in
|
||||
microcarriers}
|
||||
\newsymbol{mcrad}{R}{average radius of microcarriers}
|
||||
\newsymbol{mcnum}{n}{number of microcarriers in bulk}
|
||||
\newsymbol{vol}{V}{volume of bulk liquid in which microcarriers are suspended}
|
||||
\newsymbol{time}{t}{time}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% SI units for uber nerds
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -466,8 +496,8 @@ question for which you have no words.
|
|||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\chapter*{acknowledgements}
|
||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Acknowledgments}
|
||||
\chapter*{ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS}
|
||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
|
||||
|
||||
There are many people without which this work would not have been possible.
|
||||
Firstly, I would like to thank my advisor, Krish Roy, for his mentoring and
|
||||
|
@ -510,10 +540,12 @@ for obvious reasons :)
|
|||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\chapter*{LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS}
|
||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS}
|
||||
\printglossary[type=\acronymtype,title=LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS,toctitle=LIST OF
|
||||
ABBREVIATIONS]
|
||||
|
||||
\printglossary[type=\acronymtype]
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\printglossary[type=symbolslist,title=LIST OF SYMBOLS,toctitle=LIST OF SYMBOLS]
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
\pagenumbering{arabic}
|
||||
|
@ -1669,45 +1701,37 @@ quantified for \gls{stp} protein using the \gls{bca} assay.
|
|||
|
||||
The geometric diffusivity of the microcarriers was determined using a
|
||||
pseudo-steady-state model. Each microcarrier was assumed to be a porous sphere
|
||||
with a fixed number of uniformly distributed ``\gls{stp} binding sites'' equal
|
||||
to the number of \gls{stp} molecules experimentally determined to bind to the
|
||||
microcarriers. Because the reaction rate between biotin and \gls{stp} is so fast
|
||||
(it is the strongest non-covalent bond in known existence), we assumed that the
|
||||
interface of free biotin shrunk as a function of \gls{stp} diffusing to the
|
||||
unbound biotin interface until the center of the microcarriers was reached. We
|
||||
also assumed that the pores in the microcarriers were large enough that the
|
||||
interactions between the \gls{stp} and surfaces would be small, thus the
|
||||
geometric diffusivity could be represented as a fraction of the diffusion
|
||||
coefficient of \gls{stp} in water. This model was given by
|
||||
\cref{eqn:stp_diffusion_1,eqn:stp_diffusion_2} (see \cref{sec:appendix_binding}
|
||||
for derivations):
|
||||
with a fixed number of uniformly distributed ``receptors'' equal to the number
|
||||
of \gls{stp} molecules (here called ``ligands'') experimentally determined to
|
||||
bind to the microcarriers. Because the reaction rate between biotin and
|
||||
\gls{stp} is so fast (it is the strongest non-covalent bond in known existence),
|
||||
we assumed that the interface of unbound receptors (free biotin) shrunk as a
|
||||
function of \gls{stp} diffusing to the unbound biotin interface until the center
|
||||
of the microcarriers was reached. We also assumed that the pores in the
|
||||
microcarriers were large enough that the interactions between the \gls{stp} and
|
||||
surfaces would be small, thus the geometric diffusivity could be represented as
|
||||
a fraction of the diffusion coefficient of \gls{stp} in water. This model was
|
||||
given by \cref{eqn:stp_diffusion_1,eqn:stp_diffusion_2,eqn:stp_diffusion_3}:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_diffusion_1}
|
||||
\frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{-D_{app}C_b}{Br(1-r/R)}
|
||||
\frac{d\gls{sym:rad}}{d\gls{sym:time}} =
|
||||
\frac{- \gls{sym:appdiff} \gls{sym:bulkligconc}}
|
||||
{\gls{sym:rad} (1 - \gls{sym:rad} / \gls{sym:mcrad})
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcrecconc}}{\gls{sym:time} = 0}}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_diffusion_2}
|
||||
\frac{dC_b}{dt} = \frac{-4 \pi n D_{app} C_b}{V(1/r-1/R)}
|
||||
\frac{d\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}{d\gls{sym:time}} =
|
||||
\frac{-4 \pi \gls{sym:mcnum} \gls{sym:appdiff}\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}
|
||||
{\gls{sym:vol} (1 / \gls{sym:rad} - 1 / \gls{sym:mcrad})}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\noindent where
|
||||
\begin{itemize}[label={}]
|
||||
\item $D_{app}$ is the apparent diffusion rate of species $X$ which is equal to
|
||||
$D\beta$
|
||||
\item $D$ the diffusion rate of species $X$ in water at room temperature
|
||||
(where $X$ is \gls{stp} in this example and \glspl{mab} later in this section)
|
||||
\item $\beta$ a fractional parameter representing the tortuousity and void
|
||||
fraction of the microcarriers (here called the `geometric diffusivity')
|
||||
\item $r$ is the interfatial radius of the unbound binding sites for species $X$
|
||||
within a microcarrier
|
||||
\item $t$ is the reaction time
|
||||
\item $C_b$ is the concentration of species $X$ in the bulk solution
|
||||
\item $V$ is the volume of the bulk medium
|
||||
\item $R$ is the average radius of the microcarriers
|
||||
\item $n$ is the number of microcarriers in the reaction volume
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_diffusion_3}
|
||||
\gls{sym:appdiff}=\gls{sym:diff} \gls{sym:geodiff}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
The diffusion rate of \gls{stp} was assumed to be
|
||||
\SI{6.2e-7}{\cm\squared\per\second}\cite{Kamholz2001}. Since all but $\beta$ was
|
||||
|
@ -1725,39 +1749,33 @@ partial differential equation and boundary conditions:
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_washing}
|
||||
\frac{\partial C_i}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial
|
||||
r}\left(r^2 D_{app} \frac{\partial C_i}{\partial r}\right)
|
||||
\frac{\partial \gls{sym:mcligconc}}{\partial \gls{sym:time}} =
|
||||
\frac{1}{\gls{sym:rad}^2}
|
||||
\frac{\partial}{\partial \gls{sym:rad}}
|
||||
\left(\gls{sym:rad}^2
|
||||
\gls{sym:appdiff}
|
||||
\frac{\partial \gls{sym:mcligconc}}{\partial \gls{sym:rad}}
|
||||
\right)
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_washing_time_bc}
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcligconc}}{\gls{sym:time}=0} =
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}{\gls{sym:time}=0}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_washing_left_bc}
|
||||
C_i(r, 0) = C_{i,0}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_washing_left_bc}
|
||||
N_i(0, t) = 0
|
||||
\gls{sym:mcflux}\rvert_{\gls{sym:rad}=0} = 0
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:stp_washing_right_bc}
|
||||
C_i(R, t) = (C_{b,0}+C_{b,\infty}) / 2
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcligconc}}{\gls{sym:rad} = \gls{sym:mcrad}} =
|
||||
(\evalat{\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}{\gls{sym:time} = 0} +
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}{\gls{sym:time} = \infty}) / 2
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\noindent where (in addition to the variables given already for
|
||||
\cref{eqn:stp_diffusion_1,eqn:stp_diffusion_2})
|
||||
\begin{itemize}[label={}]
|
||||
\item $N_i$ is the radial flux of species $X$ inside the microcarriers
|
||||
\item $C_i$ is the concentration of species $X$ inside the microcarriers
|
||||
\item $C_{i,0}$ is the initial concentration of species $X$ inside
|
||||
the microcarriers (which is assumed to be the concentration in the bulk before
|
||||
the wash volume is added)
|
||||
\item $C_{b,0}$ is the initial bulk concentration of species $X$ outside the
|
||||
microcarriers after the initial wash volume has been added
|
||||
\item $C_{b,\infty}$ is the final bulk concentration of species $X$ outside the
|
||||
microcarriers
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
Note that in order to avoid solving a moving boundary value problem, the
|
||||
concentration at the boundary of the microcarriers was fixed at the average of
|
||||
the final and initial concentration expected to be observed in bulk. This should
|
||||
|
@ -1775,7 +1793,7 @@ water, which is a safe assumption given that our reaction medium was 1X
|
|||
\gls{pbs}.
|
||||
|
||||
See \cref{sec:appendix_binding} and \cref{sec:appendix_washing} for the MATLAB
|
||||
code (and output in the case of the washing steps) used.
|
||||
code and derivations, as well as output in the case of the washing steps.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Luminex Analysis}\label{sec:luminex_analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4902,47 +4920,44 @@ The code is available here: \url{https://github.gatech.edu/ndwarshuis3/mdma}.
|
|||
|
||||
\chapter{BINDING KINETICS}\label{sec:appendix_binding}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\lig}{\textit{ligand}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\rcp}{\textit{receptor}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\ligs}{\textit{ligands}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\rcps}{\textit{receptors}}
|
||||
The binding kinetics of \gls{stp} or \glspl{mab} were simulated using a
|
||||
receptor:ligand model, where the free-floating species in question was the
|
||||
ligand which bound to receptors attached to the microcarriers. Each microcarrier
|
||||
was assumed to be a porous sphere with a fixed number of receptors uniformly
|
||||
distributed throughout its interior matrix. The receptor/ligand reaction was
|
||||
assumed to be instantaneous (which is reasonable given that these are reactions
|
||||
between biotin and \gls{stp} which are extremely strong). From this, we further
|
||||
assumed a spherical interface within each microcarrier and aligned at the center
|
||||
wherein all receptors in the interior were unbound and all on the exterior were
|
||||
bound. At $\gls{sym:time}=0$ this interface was assumed to start with a radius
|
||||
equal to that of the microcarrier, and shrunk down to radius of zero as ligand
|
||||
flowed into the porous microcarriers and bound. We assumed the concentration of
|
||||
ligand to be zero at the interface and equal to the bulk concentration at the
|
||||
exterior surface of the microcarrier. Furthermore, we assumed that the interface
|
||||
moved slowly relative to the diffusion of ligand into the microcarriers, and
|
||||
thus we used a quasi-steady-state model to avoid solving a boundary value
|
||||
problem with two movable boundaries (the interface radius and the concentration
|
||||
in bulk).
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO make notation consistent
|
||||
|
||||
To model binding kinetics of either \gls{stp} or \glspl{mab} (here called
|
||||
\ligs{}), each microcarrier was assumed to be a porous sphere with a given
|
||||
number of binding sites for the \ligs{} (here called \rcps{}). The \rcp{}/\lig{}
|
||||
reaction was assumed to be instantaneous (which is reasonable given that these
|
||||
are reactions between biotin and \gls{stp} which are extremely strong). From
|
||||
this, we further assumed a spherical interface within each microcarrier and
|
||||
aligned at the center wherein all \rcps{} in the interior were unbound and all
|
||||
on the exterior were bound. At $t=0$ this interface was assumed to start with a
|
||||
radius equal to that of the microcarrier, and shrunk down to radius of zero as
|
||||
\ligs{} flowed into the porous microcarriers and bound. We assumed the
|
||||
concentration of \lig{} to be zero at the interface and equal to the bulk
|
||||
concentration at the exterior surface of the microcarrier. Furthermore, we
|
||||
assumed that the interface move slowly relative to the diffusion of \lig{} into
|
||||
the microcarriers, and thus we used a quasi-steady-state model to avoid solving
|
||||
a boundary value problem with two movable boundaries (the interface radius and
|
||||
the concentration in bulk).
|
||||
|
||||
The concentration profile of \lig{} in the microcarriers is given by Fick's
|
||||
The concentration profile of ligand in the microcarriers is given by Fick's
|
||||
Second Law in spherical coordinates assuming only radial flux and steady state.
|
||||
This with the boundary conditions as stated is:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:binding_ficks}
|
||||
0 = \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{dr}\left(r^2\frac{dC_L}{dr}\right)
|
||||
0 = \frac{1}{\gls{sym:rad}^2} \frac{d}{d\gls{sym:rad}} \left( \gls{sym:rad}^2
|
||||
\frac{d\gls{sym:mcligconc}}{d\gls{sym:rad}} \right)
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:binding_bc_left}
|
||||
C_L\rvert_{r_i} = 0
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcligconc}}{\gls{sym:rad}=\gls{sym:interrad}} = 0
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:binding_bc_right}
|
||||
C_L\rvert_R = C_{L,b}
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcligconc}}{\gls{sym:rad}=\gls{sym:mcrad}} =
|
||||
\gls{sym:bulkligconc}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
Solving \cref{eqn:binding_ficks} we find the a relation for the concentration
|
||||
|
@ -4950,7 +4965,10 @@ profile in terms of the interfacial radius:
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:binding_conc}
|
||||
C_L = \frac{C_{L,b}}{r(1/r_i - 1/R)}\left(\frac{1}{r_i} - \frac{1}{r}\right)
|
||||
\gls{sym:mcligconc} =
|
||||
\frac{\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}
|
||||
{(1 / \gls{sym:interrad} - 1 / \gls{sym:mcrad})}
|
||||
\left( \frac{1}{\gls{sym:interrad}} - \frac{1}{\gls{sym:rad}} \right)
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
Solving \cref{eqn:binding_conc} for flux, the molar flow rate into the
|
||||
|
@ -4958,7 +4976,10 @@ microcarriers is given by:
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:binding_molar_flow}
|
||||
Q = 4\pi R^2N\rvert_R = \frac{-4\pi DC}{1/r_i - 1/R}
|
||||
\gls{sym:flowrate} = 4 \pi \gls{sym:mcrad}^2
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcflux}}{\gls{sym:rad} = \gls{sym:mcrad}} =
|
||||
\frac{-4 \pi \gls{sym:appdiff} \gls{sym:bulkligconc}}
|
||||
{1 / \gls{sym:interrad} - 1 / \gls{sym:mcrad}}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
Using the quasi-steady-state assumption, we can now find time-dependent
|
||||
|
@ -4967,21 +4988,25 @@ volume in terms of molar flow rate is given by:
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:binding_volume_change}
|
||||
C_{R,0}\frac{dV_i}{dt} = -Q
|
||||
\evalat{\gls{sym:mcrecconc}}{\gls{sym:time} = 0}
|
||||
\frac{d\gls{sym:intervol}}{d\gls{sym:time}} = -\gls{sym:flowrate}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
Substituting volume of a sphere and applying the chain rule:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:radial_radial_change}
|
||||
\frac{dr_i}{dt} = \frac{-Q}{4\pi r_i^2C_{R,0}}
|
||||
\frac{d\gls{sym:interrad}}{d\gls{sym:time}} =
|
||||
\frac{-\gls{sym:flowrate}}
|
||||
{4 \pi \gls{sym:interrad}^2 \evalat{\gls{sym:mcrecconc}}{\gls{sym:time} = 0}}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
The change in bulk concentration is simply given by:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eqn:radial_conc_change}
|
||||
\frac{dC_{L,b}}{dt} = \frac{-nQ}{V}
|
||||
\frac{d\gls{sym:bulkligconc}}{d\gls{sym:time}} =
|
||||
\frac{-\gls{sym:mcnum}\gls{sym:flowrate}}{\gls{sym:vol}}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
Substituting \cref{eqn:binding_molar_flow} into \cref{eqn:radial_radial_change}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue