ENH paraphrase background
This commit is contained in:
parent
262115da8d
commit
c82c70403b
|
@ -2596,6 +2596,57 @@ CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simplified, semi-closed system for the initial selec
|
||||||
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}},
|
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}},
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Article{Guerra2001,
|
||||||
|
author = {S. Del Guerra and C. Bracci and K. Nilsson and A. Belcourt and L. Kessler and R. Lupi and L. Marselli and P. De Vos and P. Marchetti},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Biotechnology and Bioengineering},
|
||||||
|
title = {Entrapment of dispersed pancreatic islet cells in {CultiSpher}-S macroporous gelatin microcarriers: Preparation, in vitro characterization, and microencapsulation},
|
||||||
|
year = {2001},
|
||||||
|
number = {6},
|
||||||
|
pages = {741--744},
|
||||||
|
volume = {75},
|
||||||
|
doi = {10.1002/bit.10053},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {Wiley},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Article{Fernandes2007,
|
||||||
|
author = {A.M. Fernandes and T.G. Fernandes and M.M. Diogo and C. Lobato da Silva and D. Henrique and J.M.S. Cabral},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Journal of Biotechnology},
|
||||||
|
title = {Mouse embryonic stem cell expansion in a microcarrier-based stirred culture system},
|
||||||
|
year = {2007},
|
||||||
|
month = {oct},
|
||||||
|
number = {2},
|
||||||
|
pages = {227--236},
|
||||||
|
volume = {132},
|
||||||
|
doi = {10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.031},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {Elsevier {BV}},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Article{Storm_2010,
|
||||||
|
author = {Michael P. Storm and Craig B. Orchard and Heather K. Bone and Julian B. Chaudhuri and Melanie J. Welham},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Biotechnology and Bioengineering},
|
||||||
|
title = {Three-dimensional culture systems for the expansion of pluripotent embryonic stem cells},
|
||||||
|
year = {2010},
|
||||||
|
month = {jun},
|
||||||
|
number = {4},
|
||||||
|
pages = {683--695},
|
||||||
|
volume = {107},
|
||||||
|
doi = {10.1002/bit.22850},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {Wiley},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Article{Eibes2010,
|
||||||
|
author = {Gemma Eibes and Francisco dos Santos and Pedro Z. Andrade and Joana S. Boura and Manuel M.A. Abecasis and Cl{\'{a}}udia Lobato da Silva and Joaquim M.S. Cabral},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Journal of Biotechnology},
|
||||||
|
title = {Maximizing the ex vivo expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells using a microcarrier-based stirred culture system},
|
||||||
|
year = {2010},
|
||||||
|
month = {apr},
|
||||||
|
number = {4},
|
||||||
|
pages = {194--197},
|
||||||
|
volume = {146},
|
||||||
|
doi = {10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.02.015},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {Elsevier {BV}},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;}
|
@Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Comment{jabref-meta: grouping:
|
@Comment{jabref-meta: grouping:
|
||||||
|
|
149
tex/thesis.tex
149
tex/thesis.tex
|
@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
|
||||||
% \documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
|
|
||||||
\documentclass{report}
|
\documentclass{report}
|
||||||
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
|
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
|
||||||
\usepackage[top=1in,left=1.5in,right=1in,bottom=1in]{geometry}
|
\usepackage[top=1in,left=1.5in,right=1in,bottom=1in]{geometry}
|
||||||
|
@ -189,6 +188,8 @@
|
||||||
\newacronym{aws}{AWS}{amazon web services}
|
\newacronym{aws}{AWS}{amazon web services}
|
||||||
\newacronym{qpcr}{qPCR}{quantitative polymerase chain reaction}
|
\newacronym{qpcr}{qPCR}{quantitative polymerase chain reaction}
|
||||||
\newacronym{cstr}{CSTR}{continuously stirred tank bioreactor}
|
\newacronym{cstr}{CSTR}{continuously stirred tank bioreactor}
|
||||||
|
\newacronym{esc}{ESC}{embryonic stem cell}
|
||||||
|
\newacronym{msc}{MSC}{mesenchymal stromal cells}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
% SI units for uber nerds
|
% SI units for uber nerds
|
||||||
|
@ -455,9 +456,6 @@ quality in an industrial setting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section*{overview}
|
\section*{overview}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% TODO this is basically the same as the first part of the backgound, I guess I
|
|
||||||
% can just trim it down
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
T cell-based immunotherapies have received great interest from clinicians and
|
T cell-based immunotherapies have received great interest from clinicians and
|
||||||
industry due to their potential to treat, and often cure, cancer and other
|
industry due to their potential to treat, and often cure, cancer and other
|
||||||
diseases\cite{Fesnak2016,Rosenberg2015}. In 2017, Novartis and Kite Pharma
|
diseases\cite{Fesnak2016,Rosenberg2015}. In 2017, Novartis and Kite Pharma
|
||||||
|
@ -465,86 +463,63 @@ received FDA approval for \textit{Kymriah} and \textit{Yescarta} respectively,
|
||||||
two genetically-modified \gls{car} T cell therapies against B cell malignancies.
|
two genetically-modified \gls{car} T cell therapies against B cell malignancies.
|
||||||
Despite these successes, \gls{car} T cell therapies are constrained by an
|
Despite these successes, \gls{car} T cell therapies are constrained by an
|
||||||
expensive and difficult-to-scale manufacturing process with little control on
|
expensive and difficult-to-scale manufacturing process with little control on
|
||||||
cell quality and phenotype3,4. State-of-the-art T cell manufacturing techniques
|
cell quality and phenotype\cite{Roddie2019, Dwarshuis2017}. State-of-the-art T
|
||||||
focus on \acd{3} and \acd{28} activation and expansion, typically
|
cell manufacturing techniques focus on \acd{3} and \acd{28} activation and
|
||||||
presented on superparamagnetic, iron-based microbeads (Invitrogen Dynabead,
|
expansion, typically presented on superparamagnetic, iron-based microbeads
|
||||||
Miltenyi MACS beads), on nanobeads (Miltenyi TransACT), or in soluble tetramers
|
(Invitrogen Dynabead, Miltenyi MACS beads), on nanobeads (Miltenyi TransACT), or
|
||||||
(Expamer)\cite{Roddie2019,Dwarshuis2017,Wang2016, Piscopo2017, Bashour2015}.
|
in soluble tetramers (Expamer)\cite{Roddie2019,Dwarshuis2017,Wang2016,
|
||||||
These strategies overlook many of the signaling components present in the
|
Piscopo2017, Bashour2015}. These strategies overlook many of the signaling
|
||||||
secondary lymphoid organs where T cells expand \invivo{}. Typically, T cells are
|
components present in the secondary lymphoid organs where T cells expand
|
||||||
activated under close cell-cell contact, which allows for efficient
|
\invivo{}. Typically, T cells are activated under close cell-cell contact, which
|
||||||
autocrine/paracrine signaling via growth-stimulating cytokines such as
|
allows for efficient autocrine/paracrine signaling via growth-stimulating
|
||||||
\gls{il2}. Additionally, the lymphoid tissues are comprised of \gls{ecm}
|
cytokines such as \gls{il2}. Additionally, the lymphoid tissues are comprised of
|
||||||
components such as collagen, which provide signals to upregulate proliferation,
|
\gls{ecm} components such as collagen and stromal cells, which provide signals
|
||||||
cytokine production, and pro-survival pathways\cite{Gendron2003, Ohtani2008,
|
to upregulate proliferation, cytokine production, and pro-survival
|
||||||
Boisvert2007, Ben-Horin2004}. We hypothesized that culture conditions that
|
pathways\cite{Gendron2003, Ohtani2008, Boisvert2007, Ben-Horin2004}.
|
||||||
better mimic these \invivo{} expansion conditions of T cells, can significantly
|
|
||||||
improve the quality and quantity of manufactured T cells and provide better
|
|
||||||
control on the resulting T cell phenotype.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A variety of solutions have been proposed to make the T cell expansion process
|
A variety of solutions have been proposed to make the T cell expansion process
|
||||||
more physiological. One strategy is to use modified feeder cell cultures to
|
more physiological. Including feeder cell cultures\cite{Forget2014} and
|
||||||
provide activation signals similar to those of \glspl{dc}\cite{Forget2014}.
|
biomaterials-based methods such as lipid-coated microrods or 3D scaffold
|
||||||
While this has the theoretical capacity to mimic many components of the lymph
|
gels\cite{Cheung2018,Delalat2017,meyer15_immun,Lambert2017} that attempt to
|
||||||
node, it is hard to reproduce on a large scale due to the complexity and
|
recapitulate the cellular membrane, large interfacial contact area,
|
||||||
inherent variability of using cell lines in a fully \gls{gmp}-compliant manner.
|
3D-structure, or soft surfaces T cells normally experience \invivo{}. While
|
||||||
Others have proposed biomaterials-based solutions to circumvent this problem,
|
these have been shown to activation and expand T cells, they either are not
|
||||||
including lipid-coated microrods\cite{Cheung2018}, 3D-scaffolds via either
|
scalable (in the case of feeder cells) or still lack many of the signals and
|
||||||
Matrigel\cite{Rio2018} or 3d-printed lattices\cite{Delalat2017}, ellipsoid
|
cues T cells experience as the expand. Additionally, none have been shown to
|
||||||
beads\cite{meyer15_immun}, and \gls{mab}-conjugated \gls{pdms}
|
preferentially expand highly-potent T cell necessary for anti-cancer therapies.
|
||||||
beads\cite{Lambert2017} that respectively recapitulate the cellular membrane,
|
Such high potency cells including subtypes with low differentiation state such
|
||||||
large interfacial contact area, 3D-structure, or soft surfaces T cells normally
|
as \gls{tscm} and \gls{tcm} cells or CD4 cells, all of which have been shown to
|
||||||
experience \invivo{}. While these have been shown to provide superior expansion
|
be necessary for durable responses\cite{Xu2014, Fraietta2018, Gattinoni2011,
|
||||||
compared to traditional microbeads, none of these methods has been able to show
|
Gattinoni2012,Wang2018, Yang2017}. Methods to increase memory and CD4 T cells
|
||||||
preferential expansion of functional naïve/memory and CD4 T cell populations.
|
in the final product are needed. Furthermore, \gls{qbd} principles such as
|
||||||
Generally, T cells with a lower differentiation state such as naïve and memory
|
discovering and validating novel \glspl{cqa} and \glspl{cpp} in the space of T
|
||||||
cells have been shown to provide superior anti-tumor potency, presumably due to
|
cell manufacturing are required to reproducibly manufacture these subtypes and
|
||||||
their higher potential to replicate, migrate, and engraft, leading to a
|
ensure low-cost and safe products with maximal effectiveness in the clinic
|
||||||
long-term, durable response\cite{Xu2014, Fraietta2018, Gattinoni2011,
|
|
||||||
Gattinoni2012}. Likewise, CD4 T cells are similarly important to anti-tumor
|
|
||||||
potency due to their cytokine release properties and ability to resist
|
|
||||||
exhaustion\cite{Wang2018, Yang2017}. Therefore, methods to increase naïve/memory
|
|
||||||
and CD4 T cells in the final product are needed, a critical consideration being
|
|
||||||
ease of translation to industry and ability to interface with scalable systems
|
|
||||||
such as bioreactors.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% TODO probably need to address some of the modeling stuff here as well
|
This dissertation describes a novel \acrlong{dms}-based method derived from
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This thesis describes a novel degradable microscaffold-based method derived from
|
|
||||||
porous microcarriers functionalized with \acd{3} and \acd{28} \glspl{mab} for
|
porous microcarriers functionalized with \acd{3} and \acd{28} \glspl{mab} for
|
||||||
use in T cell expansion cultures. Microcarriers have historically been used
|
use in T cell expansion cultures. Microcarriers have historically been used
|
||||||
throughout the bioprocess industry for adherent cultures such as stem cells and
|
throughout the bioprocess industry for adherent cultures such as \gls{cho} cells
|
||||||
\gls{cho} cells, but not with suspension cells such as T
|
but not with suspension cells such as T cells\cite{Heathman2015, Sart2011}. The
|
||||||
cells\cite{Heathman2015, Sart2011}. The microcarriers chosen to make the DMSs in
|
microcarriers chosen to make the \gls{dms} in this work have a microporous
|
||||||
this study have a microporous structure that allows T cells to grow inside and
|
structure that allows T cells to grow inside and along the surface, providing
|
||||||
along the surface, providing ample cell-cell contact for enhanced autocrine and
|
ample cell-cell contact for enhanced autocrine and paracrine signaling.
|
||||||
paracrine signaling. Furthermore, the carriers are composed of gelatin, which is
|
Furthermore, the 3D surface of the carriers provides a larger contact area for T
|
||||||
a collagen derivative and therefore has adhesion domains that are also present
|
cells to interact with the \glspl{mab} relative to beads; this may better
|
||||||
within the lymph nodes. Finally, the 3D surface of the carriers provides a
|
emulate the large contact surface area that occurs between T cells and
|
||||||
larger contact area for T cells to interact with the \glspl{mab} relative to
|
\glspl{dc}.
|
||||||
beads; this may better emulate the large contact surface area that occurs
|
|
||||||
between T cells and \glspl{dc}. These microcarriers are readily available in
|
|
||||||
over 30 countries and are used in an FDA fast-track-approved combination retinal
|
|
||||||
pigment epithelial cell product (Spheramine, Titan
|
|
||||||
Pharmaceuticals)\cite{purcellmain}. This regulatory history will aid in clinical
|
|
||||||
translation. We show that compared to traditional microbeads, \gls{dms}-expanded
|
|
||||||
T cells not only provide superior expansion, but consistently provide a higher
|
|
||||||
frequency of naïve/memory and CD4 T cells (CCR7+CD62L+) across multiple donors.
|
|
||||||
We also demonstrate functional cytotoxicity using a CD19 \gls{car} and a
|
|
||||||
superior performance, even at a lower \gls{car} T cell dose, of
|
|
||||||
\gls{dms}-expanded \gls{car}-T cells \invivo{} in a mouse xenograft model of
|
|
||||||
human B cell \gls{all}. Our results indicate that \glspl{dms} provide a robust
|
|
||||||
and scalable platform for manufacturing therapeutic T cells with higher
|
|
||||||
naïve/memory phenotype and more balanced CD4+ T cell content.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section*{hypothesis}
|
\section*{hypothesis}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The hypothesis of this dissertation was that using \glspl{dms} created from
|
The hypothesis of this dissertation was that using \glspl{dms} created from
|
||||||
off-the-shelf microcarriers and coated with activating \glspl{mab} would lead to
|
off-the-shelf microcarriers and coated with activating \glspl{mab} would lead to
|
||||||
higher quantity and quality T cells as compared to state-of-the-art bead-based
|
higher quantity and quality T cells as compared to state-of-the-art bead-based
|
||||||
expansion. The objective of this dissertation was to develop this platform, test
|
expansion. We also hypothesized that T cells have measurable biological
|
||||||
its effectiveness both \invivo{} and \invivo{}, and develop computational
|
signatures that are predictive of downstream outcomes and phenotypes. The
|
||||||
pipelines that could be used in a manufacturing environment.
|
objective of this dissertation was to develop this platform, test its
|
||||||
|
effectiveness both \invitro{} and \invivo{}, and develop computational pipelines
|
||||||
|
to discover novel \glspl{cpp} and \glspl{cqa} that can be translated to a
|
||||||
|
manufacturing environment and a clinical trial setting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section*{specific aims}
|
\section*{specific aims}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -575,7 +550,7 @@ used to generate functional \gls{car} T cells targeted toward CD19.
|
||||||
\subsection*{aim 2: develop methods to control and predict T cell quality}
|
\subsection*{aim 2: develop methods to control and predict T cell quality}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For this second aim, we investigated methods to identify and control \glspl{cqa}
|
For this second aim, we investigated methods to identify and control \glspl{cqa}
|
||||||
and glspl{cpp} for manufacturing T cells using the \gls{dms} platform. This was
|
and \glspl{cpp} for manufacturing T cells using the \gls{dms} platform. This was
|
||||||
accomplished through two sub-aims:
|
accomplished through two sub-aims:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
@ -594,11 +569,12 @@ cells compared to state-of-the-art beads using \invivo{} mouse models for
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section*{outline}
|
\section*{outline}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In Chapter~\ref{background}, we provide additional background on the current
|
In \cref{background}, we provide additional background on the current state of T
|
||||||
state of T cell manufacturing and how the work in this dissertation moves the
|
cell manufacturing and how the work in this dissertation moves the field
|
||||||
field forward. In Chapters~\ref{aim1},~\ref{aim2a},~\ref{aim2b}, and~\ref{aim3}
|
forward. In \cref{aim1,aim2a,aim2b,aim3} we present the work pertaining to Aims
|
||||||
we present the work pertaining to Aims 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Finally, we
|
1, 2a, 2b, and 3 respectively. Finally, in \cref{conclusions} we present our
|
||||||
present our final conclusions in Chapter~\ref{conclusions}.
|
conclusions as well as provide insights for how this work can be extended in the
|
||||||
|
future.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\chapter{background and significance}\label{background}
|
\chapter{background and significance}\label{background}
|
||||||
\section*{background}
|
\section*{background}
|
||||||
|
@ -793,9 +769,9 @@ per unit volume. Other microcarriers are microporous (eg only to small
|
||||||
molecules) or not porous at all (eg polystyrene) in which case the cells can
|
molecules) or not porous at all (eg polystyrene) in which case the cells can
|
||||||
only grow on the surface.
|
only grow on the surface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Microcarriers have seen the most use in growing \gls{cho} cells and hybridomas
|
Microcarriers in general have seen the most use in growing \gls{cho} cells and
|
||||||
in the case of protein manufacturing (eg \gls{igg} production)\cite{Xiao1999,
|
hybridomas in the case of protein manufacturing (eg \gls{igg}
|
||||||
Kim2011} as well as pluripotent stem cells and mesenchymal stromal cells more
|
production)\cite{Xiao1999, Kim2011} as well as \glspl{esc} and \glspl{msc} more
|
||||||
recently in the case of cell manufacturing\cite{Heathman2015, Sart2011,
|
recently in the case of cell manufacturing\cite{Heathman2015, Sart2011,
|
||||||
Chen2013, Schop2010, Rafiq2016}. Interestingly, some groups have even explored
|
Chen2013, Schop2010, Rafiq2016}. Interestingly, some groups have even explored
|
||||||
using biodegradable microcarriers \invivo{} as a delivery vehicle for stem cell
|
using biodegradable microcarriers \invivo{} as a delivery vehicle for stem cell
|
||||||
|
@ -804,6 +780,15 @@ therapies in the context of regenerative medicine\cite{Zhang2016, Saltz2016,
|
||||||
in this application is the fact that they are adherent. In this work, we explore
|
in this application is the fact that they are adherent. In this work, we explore
|
||||||
the use of microcarrier for T cells, which are naturally non-adherent.
|
the use of microcarrier for T cells, which are naturally non-adherent.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The microcarriers used in this work were \gls{cus} and \gls{cug} (mostly the
|
||||||
|
former) which are both composed of cross-linked gelatin and have a macroporous
|
||||||
|
morphology. These specific carriers have been used in the past for pancreatic
|
||||||
|
islet cells\cite{Guerra2001}, \glspl{esc}\cite{Fernandes2007, Storm_2010}, and
|
||||||
|
\glspl{msc}\cite{Eibes2010}. Furthermore, they are readily available in over 30
|
||||||
|
countries and are used in an FDA fast-track-approved combination retinal pigment
|
||||||
|
epithelial cell product (Spheramine, Titan Pharmaceuticals)\cite{purcellmain}.
|
||||||
|
This regulatory history will aid in clinical translation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{methods to scale T cells}
|
\subsection{methods to scale T cells}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to scale T cell therapies to meet clinical demands, automation and
|
In order to scale T cell therapies to meet clinical demands, automation and
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue