From ca3a1b965154401128af77e8effcb213bd27652d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ndwarshuis Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:45:53 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] FIX typos --- tex/thesis.tex | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tex/thesis.tex b/tex/thesis.tex index 9c55557..5a4b260 100644 --- a/tex/thesis.tex +++ b/tex/thesis.tex @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ \sisetup{per-mode=symbol,list-units=single} \DeclareSIUnit\IU{IU} \DeclareSIUnit\rpm{RPM} +\DeclareSIUnit\carrier{carrier} \DeclareSIUnit\dms{DMS} \DeclareSIUnit\cell{cells} \DeclareSIUnit\ab{mAb} @@ -1154,15 +1155,14 @@ higher, further showing that the decay of \gls{snb} is not a concern. We also investigated the reaction kinetics of all three coating steps. To quantify the reaction kinetics of the biotin binding step, we reacted -multiple batches of microcarriers at \gls{rt} with -\gls{20}{\mg\of{\carrier}\per\ml} with \gls{snb} in parallel and sacrificially -analyzed each at varying timepoints using the \gls{haba} assay. This was -performed at two different concentrations. We observed that for either -concentration, the reaction was over in \SIrange{20}{30}{\minute} -(\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_mass}). Furthermore, when put in terms of fraction of -input \gls{snb}, we observed that the curves are almost identical -(\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_frac}). Given this, the reaction step for biotin -attached was set to \gls{30}{\minute}. +multiple batches of \SI{20}{\mg\per\ml} microcarriers in \gls{pbs} at \gls{rt} +with \gls{snb} in parallel and sacrificially analyzed each at varying timepoints +using the \gls{haba} assay. This was performed at two different concentrations. +We observed that for either concentration, the reaction was over in +\SIrange{20}{30}{\minute} (\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_mass}). Furthermore, when +put in terms of fraction of input \gls{snb}, we observed that the curves are +almost identical (\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_frac}). Given this, the reaction step +for biotin attached was set to \SI{30}{\minute}. % TODO these numbers might be totally incorrect Next, we quantified the amount of \gls{stp} reacted with the surface of the