* lisp/org-macs.el (org-not-nil): New function.
* lisp/org.el (org-block-todo-from-children-or-siblings-or-parent):
Use `org-not-nil' to interpret a property value of nil.
Robert Goldman writes:
> I have found what I believe to be a bug in handling ordered subtasks.
> Here is the behavior:
>
> I have a top level set of tasks that is ordered.
>
> One of the outline items below the top level set is a grab bag of tasks
> that will be performed in parallel. So this task is NOT ordered
> (ORDERED: nil).
>
> The problem is that the blocking behavior from ordered tasks seems to be
> inherited from the top level task list into the second level of the
> outline, even though the ORDERED property at the second level is
> explicitly overridden.
>
> I am attaching an org file that displays this issue. To see the
> problem, put your cursor on the "Bar" task and attempt to change its
> status to DONE.
The problem was here that the value of the property is the string
"nil", which is of course not nil.
This patches introduces a special case to interpret "nil" as nil.
* lisp/babel/langs/ob-emacs-lisp.el
(org-babel-expand-body:emacs-lisp): removed extra call to
`org-babel-process-params' which was causing referenced code blocks
to be run multiple times
(org-babel-execute:emacs-lisp): now passing processed-params through
to `org-babel-expand-body:emacs-lisp' which keeps references from
being evaluated multiple times
* lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agenda-get-timestamps): No errors
while getting TODO state.
(org-agenda-highlight-todo): No error when no keyword has
been matched.
Eric Arneson writes:
> I've discovered a bug in `org-agenda-get-timestamps' wherein an active
> timestamp before the first headline causes it to fail. I realize that
> this is probably an error in my use of active timestamps, but there was
> no really handy error message and this bugged me for weeks.
>
> I'm not familiar enough with org-mode to know what the correct behavior
> should be here (it'd be nice to get an error message saying "Don't use
> active timestamps that way!"), but here's an example .org file that will
> trigger the bug:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 3 :scope today
> Clock summary at [2010-06-20 Sun 13:09]
>
> | L | Headline | Time |
> |---+---------------------------------------+--------|
> | | *Total time* | *0:13* |
> |---+---------------------------------------+--------|
> | 1 | Track down funky bug <2010-06-20 Sun> | 0:13 |
> #+END:
>
> * Track down funky bug <2010-06-20 Sun>
> :LOGBOOK:
> CLOCK: [2010-06-20 Sun 12:43]
> CLOCK: [2010-06-20 Sun 12:30]--[2010-06-20 Sun 12:43] => 0:13
> :END:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I hope this can help somebody else track down the right place to fix
> this bug.
Thanks to Bernt Hansen for pointing this out
* doc/org.texi (Languages): updating require statements for the next
org-babel syntax
(Batch execution): updating require statements for the next
org-babel syntax
* lisp/babel/ob-exp.el (org-babel-exp-results): now checking to see if
return value of `org-babel-ref-literal' is equal to the null
indicator flag -- meaning it's now possible to accept a value of
null
* lisp/babel/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-parse): now checking to see if
return value of `org-babel-ref-literal' is equal to the null
indicator flag -- meaning it's now possible to accept a value of
null
(org-babel-ref-literal): now returning a null indicator flag when
the value is *not* a literal value, meaning it is possible to pass
in a literal value of null
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 3 Why a new name?
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I have - at least for now - chosen a new name for the new setup:
> ` org-capture'. There are two reasons for this:
In the manual it is "Capture - Refile - Archive". I remember searching
for "Remember" and never found it :)
> 5 Setup
> ~~~~~~~~
>
> To use the new setup, do the following:
>
> 1. Run
>
> M-x org-capture-import-remember-templates RET
Worked perfectly here :)
I tested all my important templates and they work.
Abandoning org-remember seems painless.
> '(("t" "templates adding table lines")
> ("ta" "add to table a" table-line (file+headline "~/notes.org" "Table A))
> ("tb" "add to table b" table-line (file+headline "~/notes.org" "Table B))
> ("tc" "add to table c" table-line (file+headline "~/notes.org" "Table C)))
>
> When starting capture, you can then first press "t" and then see
> the individual options.
This is great. Number of templates is constantly growing and the new
features will increase the speed of this process.
> 7 Request for comments
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> None of what I describe is set in stone yet - let me know if you have
> comments, change requests or other ideas.
>
> My feeling right now is that this should become the default capture
> system, and that we will keep the current org-remember in the
> distribution for quite some time, for compatibility.
Good track I guess.
Here's the tested and working patch for org-protocol.el.
To use `org-remember' and/or `org-capture' alike, copy your org-remember
link and change
javascript:location.href='org-protocol://remember://'+...
to
javascript:location.href='org-protocol://capture://'+...
The template char used is the same for both --- which is OK for me, but
could be changed.
* lisp/org.el (org-timestamp-change): New optional argument UPDOWN.
Use this to identify calls from org-timestamp-up/down, so that we can
skip by rounding minutes in this case.
(org-timestamp-up):
(org-timestamp-down):
(org-timestamp-up-day):
(org-timestamp-down-day): Call org-timestamp-change with the
updown argument.
This function used to look only if there was a prefix argument in the
current interactive call. Now we have an explicit marker indicating
that the function is called from the updown commands.
Bernt Hansen writes:
> I was talking to Jeff Stern about tags todo matching offlist and we
> think the documentation for tags-todo matching can probably be improved.
>
> The description of C-c a M at
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Matching-tags-and-properties.html
> states
>
> C-c a M
>
> Like C-c a m, but only select headlines that are also TODO items and
> force checking subitems (see variable
> org-tags-match-list-sublevels). To exclude scheduled/deadline items,
> see the variable org-agenda-tags-todo-honor-ignore-options. Matching
> specific TODO keywords together with a tags match is also possible,
> see Tag searches.
>
> When I read this I think TODO items is any todo keyword but this isn't
> the case. It is only non-done TODO state keywords. This makes
> tags-todo matching not work for finding tasks to archive (normally
> DONE | CANCELLED keywords in my setup)
>
> Should we explicitly state that 'headlines that are also TODO items'
> does not match DONE state keywords? Or alternatively should TODO items
> and DONE items be separate (and explicitly defined) in the documentation
> -- like org-todo-keywords and org-done-keywords?
>
> I still think 'TODO keyword' matches any todo keyword defined in
> org-todo-keywords and maybe I need to be re-educated :)
Bernt is right, and this patch tries to clarify the issue.
Carsten Dominik
Julien Danjou
Eric Schulte
Sebastian Rose