Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Apr 26, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
> > I noticed the following regarding
> > org-remember-backup-directory:
> >
> > 1) auto-saving does not save contents
> > - solution: put (auto-save-mode 1) before or after (not
> > sure which) the call to org-set-local in the
> > following lines in org-remember:
> >
> > # (expand-file-name
> > # (format-time-string "remember-%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S")
> > # org-remember-backup-directory))
> > # (save-buffer)
> > # (org-set-local 'auto-save-visited-file-name t))
> > # (when (save-excursion
>
> Done.
>
>
> > 2) save-buffer is called before there are any contents
> > - this causes files without useful content to stick
> > around in the dir if the buffer is killed or
> > something.
> > - solution: don't save the buffer; let auto-saving do
> > that work. will this work?
>
> Usually, the template expansion will have filled in stuff like
> links and initial contents, so I would prefer to keep the
> save-buffer here and let the user deal with the extra files.
>
> > 3) if you have auto-save-file-name-transforms set,
> > auto-saving is done according to that variable instead
> > of saving in place.
> >
> > I am now turning that variable off, locally in the remember buffer.
> > Does that fix the problem?
>
> - Carsten
>
> > - solution: is this an emacs bug? i am not sure. the
> > auto-saving should be done in place, saving in
> > org-remember-backup-directory and not saving in the
> > place where the transforms variable tells it to save.
> > perhaps each user can kludge transforms or perhaps
> > emacs needs fixing? i have reached debugging ability
> > limit.
Copying subtrees with checked off lists to create a new task would
normally require the boxes to be unchecked. This function lets
you easily clear all checkboxes in an entry without requiring
the RESET_CHECK_BOXES property.
Tassilo Horn writes:
> I have this entry in an org-file.
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ** bung Grundlagen der Softwaretechnik (B 016) :teaching:
> <2009-04-22 Wed 08:30-10:00 +1w>
> <2009-04-29 Wed 10:15-11:45> (Fr Hannes bernehmen)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I expect it to be displayed every wednesday after 2009-04-22
> for 08:30-10:00 and on 2009-04-29 it should be displayed
> twice: one at the usual time and one for 10:15-11:45.
>
> But the agenda shows only the regular entry (08:30-10:00)
> and omitts the exception. If I reorder the timestamps, so
> that the exception comes first, only the exception will be
> shown on 2009-04-29. Every other wednesday shows the
> regular repeater date.
>
> What do I have to do to make that entry showing up twice on
> 29th April?
This commit adds a new option
`org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry'. When set
to t, an entry that has multiple active time stamps will get
multiple lines in the agenda.
This reverts commit 61dfa0c67f.
This wasn't such a great idea after all. There is one case where
this is really annoying - if you are in the middle of displaying
an agenda view with lots of filters active and you change what you
are clocking it jumps away and you lose the agenda view.
This one case makes hitting a dedicated function key that runs
org-clock-goto more desireable.
Carsten Dominik
Bernt Hansen