Matt Lundin writes
> I believe that commit b8e0d6fdb4 broke
> accessing timestamps with the org-entry-get.
>
> With that commit, several functions I use to check whether an entry has
> a timestamp stopped working.
>
> In other words,
>
> (org-entry-get nil "TIMESTAMP_IA")
>
> or
>
> (org-entry-get nil "TIMESTAMP")
>
> always return nil, even if a timestamp exists.
>
> Strangely, the org-entry-properties alist includes values for TIMESTAMP
> and TIMESTAMP_IA.
>
> I tested this by evaluating the expressions in the sample entry below:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * TODO Test 💻
> <2009-12-19 Sat>
> [2009-12-19 Sat 17:47]
>
> (org-entry-get nil "TIMESTAMP_IA")
> (org-entry-get nil "TIMESTAMP")
> (org-entry-properties)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
So, for example since the following <<example>> noweb reference
appears behind the SQL comment syntax the entire inserted body will
also be SQL commented
-- <<example>>
expands to
-- this is the
-- multi-line body of example
Note that noweb replacement text which does *not* contain any
newlines will not be affected by this change, so it is still
possible to use inline noweb references.
Thanks to Sébastien Vauban for this idea.
The regular expression was not optimal, and if there was a horizontal
rule, search would not start from the beginning of the buffer but from
after the rule!
Samuel Wales writes:
> I found three places where the lowercase version of a todo
> kw is treated specially in the latest org. For example,
>
> * todo this is lowercase
>
> First, in the agenda, they have a special face.
>
> Second, when inserting an id link, they are removed.
>
> Third, when printing the olpath, they are removed. To
> reproduce, place point at bol on 5 and press the spacebar.
> I expect todo to be in the olpath, but it is not.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Samuel
>
>
> * 1
> *** 2
> ***** here are some keywords i like
> ******* todo
> ********* 5
When an agenda custom command has an empty string as MATCH element, so
far this would lead to a meaningless search using an empty matcher.
Now and empty (or white) string will be interpreted just like a nil
matcher, i.e. the user will be prompted for the match.
Eric Schulte
Carsten Dominik
John Wiegley
Eric Schulte