FIX typos

This commit is contained in:
Nathan Dwarshuis 2021-07-27 17:45:53 -04:00
parent 07644e1724
commit ca3a1b9651
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
\sisetup{per-mode=symbol,list-units=single}
\DeclareSIUnit\IU{IU}
\DeclareSIUnit\rpm{RPM}
\DeclareSIUnit\carrier{carrier}
\DeclareSIUnit\dms{DMS}
\DeclareSIUnit\cell{cells}
\DeclareSIUnit\ab{mAb}
@ -1154,15 +1155,14 @@ higher, further showing that the decay of \gls{snb} is not a concern.
We also investigated the reaction kinetics of all three coating steps.
To quantify the reaction kinetics of the biotin binding step, we reacted
multiple batches of microcarriers at \gls{rt} with
\gls{20}{\mg\of{\carrier}\per\ml} with \gls{snb} in parallel and sacrificially
analyzed each at varying timepoints using the \gls{haba} assay. This was
performed at two different concentrations. We observed that for either
concentration, the reaction was over in \SIrange{20}{30}{\minute}
(\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_mass}). Furthermore, when put in terms of fraction of
input \gls{snb}, we observed that the curves are almost identical
(\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_frac}). Given this, the reaction step for biotin
attached was set to \gls{30}{\minute}.
multiple batches of \SI{20}{\mg\per\ml} microcarriers in \gls{pbs} at \gls{rt}
with \gls{snb} in parallel and sacrificially analyzed each at varying timepoints
using the \gls{haba} assay. This was performed at two different concentrations.
We observed that for either concentration, the reaction was over in
\SIrange{20}{30}{\minute} (\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_mass}). Furthermore, when
put in terms of fraction of input \gls{snb}, we observed that the curves are
almost identical (\cref{fig:dms_biotin_rxn_frac}). Given this, the reaction step
for biotin attached was set to \SI{30}{\minute}.
% TODO these numbers might be totally incorrect
Next, we quantified the amount of \gls{stp} reacted with the surface of the