ndwarshuis
/
phd_thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ADD regression tables for DOE

This commit is contained in:
Nathan Dwarshuis 2021-07-29 12:20:27 -04:00
parent c5820b034d
commit f6a24398ca
4 changed files with 96 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
tables/doe_cd4.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Thu, Jul 29, 2021 - 12:14:17 PM
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lc}
\\[-1.8ex]\hline
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
& \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\
\cline{2-2}
\\[-1.8ex] & CD4+ Cells \\
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
Dataset [2] & 1,271,171.000$^{**}$ \\
Functional mAb \% & 44,896.500$^{***}$ \\
IL2 Conc. (IU/ml) & 86,177.710$^{***}$ \\
DMS Conc. (1/ml) & 1,742.752$^{***}$ \\
Intercept & $-$5,344,494.000$^{***}$ \\
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
Observations & 30 \\
R$^{2}$ & 0.888 \\
Adjusted R$^{2}$ & 0.870 \\
Residual Std. Error & 727,042.800 (df = 25) \\
F Statistic & 49.454$^{***}$ (df = 4; 25) \\
\hline
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
\textit{Note:} & \multicolumn{1}{r}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\
\end{tabular}

24
tables/doe_mem1.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Thu, Jul 29, 2021 - 12:14:08 PM
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lc}
\\[-1.8ex]\hline
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
& \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\
\cline{2-2}
\\[-1.8ex] & CD62L+CCR7+ Cells \\
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
Dataset [2] & 4,661,754.000$^{*}$ \\
Functional mAb \% & 72,218.190 \\
IL2 Conc. (IU/ml) & 306,486.100$^{***}$ \\
DMS Conc. (1/ml) & 240.038 \\
Intercept & $-$3,478,851.000 \\
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
Observations & 30 \\
R$^{2}$ & 0.331 \\
Adjusted R$^{2}$ & 0.224 \\
Residual Std. Error & 3,659,501.000 (df = 25) \\
F Statistic & 3.096$^{**}$ (df = 4; 25) \\
\hline
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
\textit{Note:} & \multicolumn{1}{r}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\
\end{tabular}

31
tables/doe_mem2.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Thu, Jul 29, 2021 - 12:14:14 PM
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lc}
\\[-1.8ex]\hline
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
& \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\
\cline{2-2}
\\[-1.8ex] & log(CD62L+CCR7+ Cells) \\
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
Dataset [2] & 0.269 \\
Functional mAb \% & 2.408$^{*}$ \\
(Functional mAb \%)**2 & 0.443$^{*}$ \\
IL2 Conc. (IU/ml) & 6.054$^{*}$ \\
(IL2 Conc. (IU/ml))**2 & $-$0.730$^{**}$ \\
DMS Conc. (1/ml) & 7.437$^{**}$ \\
(DMS Conc. (1/ml))**2 & $-$0.486$^{*}$ \\
(Functional mAb \%)*(IL2 Conc. (IU/ml)) & $-$0.001 \\
(Functional mAb \%)*(DMS Conc. (1/ml)) & $-$0.00001$^{*}$ \\
(IL2 Conc. (IU/ml)*(DMS Conc. (1/ml)) & $-$0.0001$^{*}$ \\
(Functional mAb \%)*(IL2 Conc. (IU/ml)*(DMS Conc. (1/ml)) & 0.00000$^{*}$ \\
Intercept & 20.899$^{***}$ \\
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
Observations & 30 \\
R$^{2}$ & 0.741 \\
Adjusted R$^{2}$ & 0.583 \\
Residual Std. Error & 0.228 (df = 18) \\
F Statistic & 4.693$^{***}$ (df = 11; 18) \\
\hline
\hline \\[-1.8ex]
\textit{Note:} & \multicolumn{1}{r}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\
\end{tabular}

18
tex/thesis.tex
View File

@ -2022,7 +2022,23 @@ provide these benefits.
\label{fig:doe_responses}
\end{figure*}
% TABLE DOE regression results
\begin{table}[!h] \centering
\caption{Total CD62L+CCR7+ T cell response (first order regression)}
\label{tab:doe_mem1.tex}
\input{../tables/doe_mem1.tex}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[!h] \centering
\caption{Total CD62L+CCR7+ T cell response (third order regression)}
\label{tab:doe_mem2.tex}
\input{../tables/doe_mem2.tex}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[!h] \centering
\caption{Total CD4+ T cell response}
\label{tab:doe_cd4.tex}
\input{../tables/doe_cd4.tex}
\end{table}
% TODO this section header sucks
\subsection{AI modeling reveals highly predictive species}